Pietrucha Artur Z, Wnuk Mateusz, Wojewódka-Zak Ewa, Wegrzynowska Marta, Mroczek-Czernecka Danuta, Bzukała Irena, Konduracka Ewa, Piwowarska Wiesława
Department of Coronary Disease, Institute of Cardiology, Medical School of Jagiellonian University, John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S158-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02275.x.
Evaluation of sinus and atrioventricular nodes function as a potential factor responsible for prolonged bradycardia, asystole, or both in patients with cardioinhibitory and non-cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS). The study included 258 patients (mean age = 47.7 +/- 17.2 years; range 18-62; 147 females) with a history of VVS. They were divided among four groups, according to results of head-up tilt test (HUTT).
All patients underwent standard HUTT, carotid sinus massage (CSM), and rapid transesophageal atrial pacing for evaluation of total sinus node recovery time (SNRT), and corrected sinus node recovery time (CNRT), resting and intrinsic heart rate (IHR), and Wenckebach point (WP). Values of SNRT > 1,500 ms, CNRT > 525 ms, WP < 130 bpm, and CSM-induced pause >3 seconds were considered abnormal.
SNRT, CNRT, and WP before and after pharmacological blockade, resting heart rate, and IHR did not differ significantly among the study groups. The prevalence of mild sinus node dysfunction (SND), decreased value of WP, and cardioinhibitory carotid sinus hypersensitivity was similar among all study groups.
The prevalence of mild SND, abnormal atrioventricular conduction, and carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) was similar among patients with VVS regardless of the type of vasovagal reaction. SND and CSH do not seem to play an important role in the pathogenesis of cardioinhibitory vasovagal reaction.
评估窦房结和房室结功能,作为导致心脏抑制性和非心脏抑制性血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)患者出现长时间心动过缓、心脏停搏或两者兼有的潜在因素。该研究纳入了258例有VVS病史的患者(平均年龄 = 47.7 ± 17.2岁;年龄范围18 - 62岁;女性147例)。根据直立倾斜试验(HUTT)结果,将他们分为四组。
所有患者均接受标准HUTT、颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)和经食管快速心房起搏,以评估总窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)、校正窦房结恢复时间(CNRT)、静息心率和固有心率(IHR)以及文氏点(WP)。SNRT > 1500毫秒、CNRT > 525毫秒、WP < 130次/分钟以及CSM诱发的停搏> 3秒被视为异常。
各研究组之间,药物阻断前后的SNRT、CNRT和WP、静息心率以及IHR并无显著差异。所有研究组中,轻度窦房结功能障碍(SND)的患病率、WP值降低以及心脏抑制性颈动脉窦过敏的情况相似。
无论血管迷走反应的类型如何,VVS患者中轻度SND、房室传导异常和颈动脉窦过敏(CSH)的患病率相似。SND和CSH似乎在心脏抑制性血管迷走反应的发病机制中不起重要作用。