• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的缝线固定法在儿科患者中产生的并发症较少。

Sutured securement of peripherally inserted central catheters yields fewer complications in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Graf Jeanine M, Newman Christopher D, McPherson Mona L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Section of Intensive Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):532-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030006532.

DOI:10.1177/0148607106030006532
PMID:17047181
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can be secured with tape, sutures, or sutureless securement devices. Despite widespread catheter use, no standardized method of securement has been proven superior.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial of catheter securement with either tape or suture was undertaken in pediatric patients hospitalized at a tertiary children's hospital. Patient demographics, catheter dwell time, and all catheter complications were collected. All patients were followed for the entire dwell time of the catheter, including those discharged with lines still in place.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients completed the study, with 34 children in the suture group and 32 children in the tape group. Patients' ages ranged from 9 months to 19 years. Overall complication rate in our sutured group was 5.8%, and 32.4% in the tape group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of children of varying ages, sutured PICCs were associated with significantly fewer complications than those catheters secured with tape (p=.005). The 3 most common complications included migration, occlusion, and leaking catheters.

摘要

背景

儿科经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)可用胶带、缝线或免缝固定装置进行固定。尽管导管使用广泛,但尚未证明哪种标准化固定方法更具优势。

方法

在一家三级儿童医院住院的儿科患者中进行了一项关于用胶带或缝线固定导管的前瞻性随机试验。收集了患者的人口统计学数据、导管留置时间和所有导管相关并发症。所有患者在导管的整个留置期间均接受随访,包括那些出院时导管仍在位的患者。

结果

66名患者完成了研究,缝线组有34名儿童,胶带组有32名儿童。患者年龄从9个月到19岁不等。我们的缝线组总体并发症发生率为5.8%,胶带组为32.4%。

结论

在这项针对不同年龄段儿童的研究中,缝线固定的PICC与用胶带固定的导管相比,并发症明显更少(p = 0.005)。3种最常见的并发症包括移位、堵塞和导管渗漏。

相似文献

1
Sutured securement of peripherally inserted central catheters yields fewer complications in pediatric patients.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的缝线固定法在儿科患者中产生的并发症较少。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 Nov-Dec;30(6):532-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030006532.
2
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.成人急性医院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性研究(CASCADE):一项试点随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
3
Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters.无缝合固定装置可减少外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的并发症。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Jan;13(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)60012-8.
4
Why are we stuck on tape and suture? A review of catheter securement devices.为什么我们还依赖胶带和缝线?导管固定装置综述。
J Infus Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;29(1):34-8. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200601000-00007.
5
Securement to Prevent Noncuffed Central Venous Catheter Dislodgement in Pediatrics: The SECURED Superiority Randomized Clinical Trial.预防儿科无袖中央静脉导管移位的固定:SECURED 优势随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Sep 1;178(9):861-869. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2202.
6
Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.前瞻性随机对照评价近端瓣膜聚亚安酯和远端瓣膜硅树脂外周置入中心导管。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Aug;21(8):1191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
7
An observational study of the securement of central venous access devices with a subcutaneous anchor device in a paediatric population at a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院对儿科患者使用皮下锚定装置固定中心静脉通路装置的观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Nov;21(6):959-962. doi: 10.1177/1129729820918460. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Survey of the use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in children.儿童外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的使用情况调查
Pediatrics. 1997 Feb;99(2):E4. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.2.e4.
9
Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center.带囊外周静脉置入中心导管优于无囊外周静脉置入中心导管吗?三级儿科中心的回顾性研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
PICC securement: minimising potential complications.
Nurs Stand. 2001;15(43):42-4. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.07.15.43.42.c3056.

引用本文的文献

1
PICC tip dislodgement causing massive pleural effusion and atelectasis with acute respiratory failure: a case report.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)尖端移位致大量胸腔积液和肺不张伴急性呼吸衰竭:一例报告。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04856-2.
2
Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.中心血管通路装置的随机对照试验:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0174164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174164. eCollection 2017.