Põlluste Kaja, Habicht Jarno, Kalda Ruth, Lember Margus
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Dec;18(6):403-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl055. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
To assess the quality of the Estonian health system with the assessment tool provided by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Situation analysis of health care quality using the self-assessment questionnaire proposed by the Council of Europe and WHO Regional Office for Europe as a framework for evaluating national quality activities.
Estonia.
Four domains for evaluating the national quality activities: policy, organization, methods, and resources.
The quality policy of Estonian health care developed in the late 1990s defines the scope of quality and reflects the different viewpoints of stakeholders. Nevertheless, it is not comprehensive enough, activities planned for the involvement of consumers in defining and assessing quality are lacking, and key roles of institutions in quality improvement and incentives for quality are not clearly defined. At present, the responsibilities for quality assurance are distributed among the different stakeholders, but there is no single coordinating structure or mechanism for facilitating or assessing the implementation of the quality activities. Many regulations are established to assure the quality of health services and to protect patients' rights, but the implementation of voluntary mechanisms for quality assurance should be promoted. Access to the sources of information is good, but there is a shortage of unified quality and performance indicators at the national level.
The results of this study indicated the strengths and shortages of the present organization of quality activities in Estonia and the ways for improvement. Strengthening coordination with explicit quality monitoring was found as a key factor for improvement.
使用世界卫生组织(WHO)提供的评估工具评估爱沙尼亚卫生系统的质量。
采用欧洲委员会和WHO欧洲区域办事处提出的自我评估问卷对医疗保健质量进行情况分析,以此作为评估国家质量活动的框架。
爱沙尼亚。
评估国家质量活动的四个领域:政策、组织、方法和资源。
爱沙尼亚20世纪90年代末制定的医疗保健质量政策界定了质量范围,反映了利益相关者的不同观点。然而,该政策不够全面,缺乏让消费者参与界定和评估质量的计划活动,且未明确机构在质量改进中的关键作用以及质量激励措施。目前,质量保证责任由不同利益相关者分担,但没有单一的协调结构或机制来促进或评估质量活动的实施。为确保卫生服务质量和保护患者权利制定了许多规定,但应推动自愿质量保证机制的实施。信息获取渠道良好,但国家层面缺乏统一的质量和绩效指标。
本研究结果表明了爱沙尼亚目前质量活动组织的优势与不足以及改进方法。加强协调并进行明确的质量监测被认为是改进的关键因素。