Suppr超能文献

评估卫生系统中质量政策和策略的工具:范围综述方案。

Instruments for assessing quality policies and strategies in health systems: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Secretary of State for Public Health of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):e065846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065846.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The World Organization recommends to implement National Quality Policies and Strategies in health systems, but few instruments have been proposed to assess and monitor these quality interventions at the system level. This study will map and compare instruments for the assessment of quality policies and strategies in health systems around the world.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a scoping review protocol developed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute's manual and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search for articles will be performed in the following Embase, Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Searches will also be conducted on Google Scholar and grey literature (www.opengrey.eu). A descriptive analysis of studies mapped by analysis categories will be performed. The results will be presented through a narrative summary of the mapped findings to verify how the results correlate with the objective and research question of the review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study does not require an ethical review due to its nature. The submission of results for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at a scientific conference is expected. LINK TO THE PROTOCOL RECORD IN THE OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK OSF: https://DOI.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KMTS.

摘要

简介

世界卫生组织建议在卫生系统中实施国家质量政策和战略,但很少有工具被提出用于评估和监测系统层面的这些质量干预措施。本研究将对全球卫生系统中用于评估质量政策和战略的工具进行映射和比较。

方法和分析

这是根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所手册制定的范围审查方案,并由系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目指导。将在 Embase、Medline/Pubmed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 中搜索文章。还将在 Google Scholar 和灰色文献(www.opengrey.eu)上进行搜索。将对按分析类别映射的研究进行描述性分析。结果将通过映射结果的叙述性总结呈现,以验证结果与审查的目标和研究问题的相关性。

伦理和传播

由于研究性质,本研究不需要伦理审查。预计将在同行评议期刊上提交结果并在科学会议上展示。在开放科学框架 OSF 中查看协议记录的链接:https://DOI.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KMTS。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Afghanistan's national strategy for improving quality in health care.阿富汗改善医疗质量国家战略。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Jul;25(3):270-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt013. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
6
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.范围研究:方法学的推进。
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
8
Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.质量改进计划的评估
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):270-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.270.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验