Suppr超能文献

无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗对比

Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

作者信息

Yi L, Jingping B, Gele J, Baoleri X, Taixiang W

机构信息

The Kelamayi City Central Hospital of Xin Jiang, Dept of Orthopaedics, Kelamayi, Xin Jiang, China.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005079.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal burst fractures result from the failure of both the anterior and the middle columns of the spine under axial compression loads. Conservative management is through bed rest, and immobilization with a brace once the acute symptoms have settled. Surgical treatment involves either anterior or posterior stabilization of the fracture with screws, often with decompression, an operation to remove bone fragments which have intruded into the vertebral canal.

OBJECTIVES

To compare operative with non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register (May 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (January 1988 to April 2005), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) available at http://cbm.imicams.ac.cn (January 1978 to April 2005). We also searched reference lists of articles, handsearched journals and conference proceedings, and contacted authors where necessary.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing operative with non-operative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. Pooling of data was not carried out as only one small, poor quality trial was included.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one trial comparing operative with non-operative treatment (53 participants). There was no statistically significant difference in pain and function-related outcomes, rates of return to work, radiographic findings or average length of hospitalization at final follow up. The rate of complications was higher for the patients treated operatively. The degree of kyphosis or the percentage of correction lost did not correlate with any clinical symptoms at the time of the final follow up. Average costs related to hospitalization and treatment in the operative group appeared to be more than in the non-operative group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference on the functional outcome two years or more after therapy between operative and non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. However, this review was able to include only one randomized controlled trial with a small sample size and poor quality, which precluded firm conclusions. More research with high quality trials is needed.

摘要

背景

脊柱爆裂骨折是由于脊柱前柱和中柱在轴向压缩载荷下失效所致。保守治疗方法是卧床休息,待急性症状缓解后使用支具固定。手术治疗包括用螺钉对骨折进行前路或后路固定,通常还包括减压,即通过手术清除侵入椎管的骨碎片。

目的

比较胸腰椎爆裂骨折无神经功能缺损时手术治疗与非手术治疗的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节与肌肉创伤组专业注册库(2005年5月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2005年第2期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2005年4月)、EMBASE(1988年1月至2005年4月)以及可从http://cbm.imicams.ac.cn获取的中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)(1978年1月至2005年4月)。我们还检索了文章的参考文献列表,手工检索了期刊和会议论文集,并在必要时联系了作者。

选择标准

比较胸腰椎爆裂骨折无神经功能缺损时手术治疗与非手术治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。由于仅纳入了一项样本量小且质量差的试验,未进行数据合并。

主要结果

我们纳入了一项比较手术治疗与非手术治疗的试验(53名参与者)。在最终随访时,疼痛和功能相关结局、重返工作率、影像学结果或平均住院时间方面,两组之间无统计学显著差异。手术治疗患者的并发症发生率更高。后凸畸形程度或矫正丢失百分比与最终随访时的任何临床症状均无相关性。手术组与住院和治疗相关的平均费用似乎高于非手术组。

作者结论

对于无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折,手术治疗与非手术治疗在治疗两年或更长时间后的功能结局上无统计学显著差异。然而,本综述仅纳入了一项样本量小且质量差的随机对照试验,这使得无法得出确凿结论。需要更多高质量试验的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验