Shelley Mike, Harrison Craig, Coles Bernadette, Staffurth John, Wilt Timothy J, Mason Malcolm D
Velindre NHS Trust, Research Laboratories, Velindre Road, Whitchurch, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005247. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005247.pub2.
Prostate cancer mainly affects elderly men, and its incidence has steadily increased over the last decade. The management of this disease is replete with controversy. In men with advanced, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone therapy is almost universally accepted as the initial treatment of choice and produces good responses in most patients. However, many patients will relapse and become resistant to further hormone manipulation; the outlook for these patients is poor. Many have disease extending to the skeleton, which is associated with severe pain. Therapies for these men include chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, palliative radiotherapy, and radioisotopes. Systemic chemotherapy has been evaluated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) for many years, with disappointing results. However, more recent studies with newer agents have shown encouraging results. There is therefore a need to explore the value of chemotherapy in this disease.
The present review aims to assess the role of chemotherapy in men with metastatic HRPC. The major outcome was overall survival. Secondary objectives include the effect of chemotherapy on pain relief, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, quality of life, and treatment-related toxicity.
Trials were identified by searching electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, and handsearching of relevant journals and conference proceedings. There was no restriction of language or location.
Only published randomised trials of chemotherapy in HRPC patients were eligible for inclusion in this review. Randomised comparisons of different chemotherapeutic regimens, chemotherapy versus best standard of care or placebo, were relevant to this review. Randomised, dose-escalation studies were not included in this review.
Data extraction tables were designed specifically for this review to aid data collection. Data from relevant studies were extracted and included information on trial design, participants, and outcomes. Trial quality was also assessed using a scoring system for randomisation, blinding, and description of patient withdrawal.
Out of 107 randomised trials of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer identified by the search strategy, 47 were included in this review and represented 6929 patients with HRPC. Only two trials compared the same chemotherapeutic interventions and therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. The quality of some trials was poor because of poor reporting, low-patient recruitment, or poor trial design. For clarity, trials were categorised according to the major drug used, but this was not a definitive grouping, since many trials used several agents and would be eligible for inclusion in a number of categories. Drug categories included estramustine, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and docetaxel. Only studies using docetaxel reported a significant improvement in overall survival compared to best standard of care, although the increase was small (< 2.5 months). The mean percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in PSA compared to baseline was as follows: estramustine 48%; 5-fluorouracil 20%; doxorubicin 50% (one study only); mitoxantrone 33%; and docetaxel 52%. Pain relief was reported in 35% to 76% of patients receiving either single agents or combination regimens. A three weekly regime of docetaxel significantly improved pain relief compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone (the latter regimen approved as standard therapy for HRPC in the USA). All chemotherapeutics, either as single agents or in combination, were associated with toxicity; the major ones being myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, cardiac toxicity, neuropathy, and alopecia. Quality of life was significantly improved with docetaxel compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HRPC have not traditionally been offered chemotherapy as a routine treatment because of treatment-related toxicity and poor responses. Recent data from randomised studies, in particular those using docetaxel, have provided encouraging improvements in overall survival, palliation of symptoms, and improvements in quality of life. Chemotherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with HRPC. However, patients should make an informed decision based on the risks and benefits of chemotherapy.
前列腺癌主要影响老年男性,在过去十年中其发病率稳步上升。这种疾病的治疗充满争议。在患有晚期转移性前列腺癌的男性中,激素疗法几乎被普遍视为首选的初始治疗方法,并且在大多数患者中产生良好反应。然而,许多患者会复发并对进一步的激素治疗产生耐药性;这些患者的预后很差。许多患者的疾病已扩散至骨骼,这与严重疼痛相关。针对这些男性的治疗方法包括化疗、双膦酸盐、姑息性放疗和放射性同位素。多年来一直在评估激素难治性前列腺癌(HRPC)男性患者的全身化疗,结果令人失望。然而,最近使用新型药物的研究显示出令人鼓舞的结果。因此,有必要探索化疗在这种疾病中的价值。
本综述旨在评估化疗在转移性HRPC男性患者中的作用。主要结局是总生存期。次要目标包括化疗对疼痛缓解、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应、生活质量和治疗相关毒性的影响。
通过检索电子数据库(如MEDLINE)以及手工检索相关期刊和会议论文集来确定试验。对语言或地点没有限制。
只有已发表的HRPC患者化疗随机试验才有资格纳入本综述。不同化疗方案的随机比较、化疗与最佳标准治疗或安慰剂的比较与本综述相关。本综述不包括随机剂量递增研究。
专门为本综述设计了数据提取表以辅助数据收集。从相关研究中提取的数据包括试验设计、参与者和结局的信息。还使用随机化、盲法和患者退出描述的评分系统评估试验质量。
通过检索策略确定的107项晚期前列腺癌化疗随机试验中,47项纳入本综述,代表6929例HRPC患者。只有两项试验比较了相同的化疗干预措施,因此认为进行荟萃分析不合适。由于报告不佳、患者招募率低或试验设计不佳,一些试验的质量较差。为清晰起见,试验根据使用的主要药物进行分类,但这不是确定的分组,因为许多试验使用了几种药物,可能符合多个类别的纳入标准。药物类别包括雌莫司汀、5-氟尿嘧啶、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、米托蒽醌和多西他赛。与最佳标准治疗相比,只有使用多西他赛的研究报告总生存期有显著改善,尽管增加幅度较小(<2.5个月)。与基线相比,PSA至少降低50%的患者平均百分比如下:雌莫司汀48%;5-氟尿嘧啶20%;多柔比星50%(仅一项研究);米托蒽醌33%;多西他赛52%。接受单药或联合方案治疗的患者中,35%至76%报告有疼痛缓解。与米托蒽醌加泼尼松(后一种方案在美国被批准为HRPC的标准治疗)相比,每三周一次的多西他赛方案显著改善了疼痛缓解。所有化疗药物,无论是单药还是联合使用,都与毒性相关;主要毒性包括骨髓抑制、胃肠道毒性、心脏毒性、神经病变和脱发。与米托蒽醌加泼尼松相比,多西他赛显著改善了生活质量。
由于治疗相关毒性和反应不佳,传统上未将化疗作为HRPC患者的常规治疗方法。随机研究的最新数据,特别是使用多西他赛的研究,在总生存期、症状缓解和生活质量改善方面提供了令人鼓舞的进展。化疗应被视为HRPC患者的一种治疗选择。然而,患者应根据化疗的风险和益处做出明智的决定。