Suppr超能文献

急诊科短期留观病房替代标准住院治疗的有效性和安全性。

Effectiveness and safety of an emergency department short-stay unit as an alternative to standard inpatient hospitalisation.

作者信息

Juan A, Salazar A, Alvarez A, Perez J R, Garcia L, Corbella X

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2006 Nov;23(11):833-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.033647.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department short-stay units (EDSSUs) are currently emerging worldwide as an alternative to standard inpatient hospitalisation. In our hospital, a 960-bed teaching tertiary institution in Barcelona, Spain, an EDSSU has been in operation during winter periods (November-March) since 1997.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of our EDSSU.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of activity and quality outcomes, assessment of patient satisfaction levels and determination of the diagnostic-related groups that were mainly responsible for admissions to the EDSSU, comparing the clinical characteristics of those patients with the characteristics of patients with similar clinical diagnoses admitted to standard hospitalisation units.

RESULTS

5666 patients were treated in the EDSSU, with a progressive increase in the number of patients admitted per period, ranging from 707 in 1997-8 to 1227 in 2003-4 (73.5% increase). The mean length of stay ranged from 3.1 to 2.8 days, mortality from 2.5% to 5.1%, home discharge rate from 84% to 90%, and hospital readmission rate within the first week after discharge from 3.9% to 6.2%. In all, 98% of patients were satisfied with their stay at the EDSSU. The main diagnostic-related groups were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD = 50%) and acute heart failure (28%). Patients with COPD admitted at the EDSSU (n = 545) showed significantly (p = 0.05) lower mean length of stay (3.4 v 12 days) and mortality (1.7% v 8.1%), but a higher hospital readmission rate (9.9% v 7%) than those admitted to standard inpatient units (n = 1961).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the EDSSU proved to be an effective and safe alternative to standard inpatient hospitalisation.

摘要

背景

急诊科短期留观病房(EDSSU)目前在全球范围内逐渐兴起,成为标准住院治疗的一种替代方式。在我们医院,即西班牙巴塞罗那一家拥有960张床位的教学型三级医疗机构,自1997年起,EDSSU在冬季(11月至次年3月)投入使用。

目的

确定我们医院EDSSU的疗效和安全性。

方法

对活动和质量结果进行回顾性分析,评估患者满意度水平,并确定导致患者入住EDSSU的主要诊断相关分组,将这些患者的临床特征与入住标准住院病房的具有相似临床诊断的患者特征进行比较。

结果

5666名患者在EDSSU接受治疗,各时期收治患者数量逐渐增加,从1997 - 1998年的707例增至2003 - 2004年的1227例(增长73.5%)。平均住院时间从3.1天降至2.8天,死亡率从2.5%升至5.1%,出院回家率从84%升至90%,出院后第一周内的医院再入院率从3.9%升至6.2%。总体而言,98%的患者对在EDSSU的住院经历感到满意。主要诊断相关分组为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD,占50%)和急性心力衰竭(占28%)。在EDSSU住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(n = 545)与入住标准住院病房的患者(n = 1961)相比,平均住院时间显著缩短(3.4天对12天,p = 0.05),死亡率更低(1.7%对8.1%),但医院再入院率更高(9.9%对7%)。

结论

根据我们的经验,EDSSU被证明是标准住院治疗的一种有效且安全的替代方式。

相似文献

4
General Characteristics and Activity of Emergency Department Short-Stay Units in Spanish Hospitals.
J Emerg Med. 2017 May;52(5):764-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.045. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

7
State of emergency medicine in Spain.西班牙急诊医学状况。
Int J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec 8;3(4):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0249-x.
9
Emergency care in the first 48 hours.最初48小时内的急救护理
BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):218-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39099.591528.80.

本文引用的文献

6
Overcrowding in the ED: an international symptom of health care system failure.
Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Mar;17(2):208-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90064-5.
7
[Emergency department observation and short term unit].
An Med Interna. 1998 Mar;15(3):138-41.
9
Patterns of hospitalization in elderly patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;156(6):1807-12. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9611008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验