• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健机构准备好接纳电子健康了吗?一项针对伦敦一家初级保健信托机构员工的定性研究。

Is primary care ready to embrace e-health? A qualitative study of staff in a London primary care trust.

作者信息

Mannan Rishi, Murphy Jeannette, Jones Melvyn

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(2):121-31. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v14i2.622.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v14i2.622
PMID:17059701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

e-Health refers to the organisation and delivery of health services and information using the internet and related technologies. We investigated the perceptions of primary care staff towards e-health initiatives in the NHS Connecting for Health programme and whether front-line staff are ready to implement such changes.

DESIGN

Twenty participants from different professional groups were purposively selected for interview, based on their current computer usage. The same practice staff were subsequently observed in order to gain an insight into how they use computers.

SUBJECTS

Practice staff (doctors, nurses, practice managers and receptionists) who will be expected to use new information technology and primary care trust (PCT) staff who are involved in its implementation were selected to participate in this study.

SETTING

A north London PCT with 62 general practices. Four practices were selected for the study.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews and the observational data yielded six recurrent themes that have a bearing on readiness to use information and communication systems to support clinical care: perceptions of technology and NHS Connecting for Health; issues relating to resources; patient choice; matters relating to confidentiality and security; political pressures; and how information technology is currently used within primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of the study the systems that form part of NHS Connecting for Health, apart from the Quality Management and Analysis System (QMAS), were not implemented across the PCT. All the practices in the study acknowledged the benefits new technology would bring to the workplace, but there were also some common concerns, which suggest that staff working in primary care practices are not ready for e-health. Successful implementation of the NHS Connecting for Health programme rests on identifying, acknowledging and overcoming these concerns. A different approach might be required for those practices that have made very little progress in using email or moving towards an electronic patient record. This study suggests that a mistrust of technology and fears as to the heavy initial workload involved in becoming fully computerised have dissuaded some practices from embracing e-health. If NHS Connecting for Health is to be a success, implementation teams might need to focus initially on practices that have been reluctant to use technology to support both clinical care and the day-to-day work of the practice.

摘要

目标

电子健康是指利用互联网及相关技术来组织和提供卫生服务与信息。我们调查了基层医疗人员对国民健康服务体系“健康连线”项目中电子健康举措的看法,以及一线工作人员是否准备好实施此类变革。

设计

根据当前计算机使用情况,有目的地挑选了20名来自不同专业组的参与者进行访谈。随后观察了同一批医疗机构工作人员,以便深入了解他们如何使用计算机。

研究对象

预计会使用新信息技术的医疗机构工作人员(医生、护士、医疗机构管理人员和接待员)以及参与其实施工作的基层医疗信托基金(PCT)工作人员被选入本研究。

研究地点

伦敦北部一个拥有62家普通诊所的基层医疗信托基金。选取了4家诊所进行研究。

结果

对访谈和观察数据的分析得出了六个反复出现的主题,这些主题与使用信息和通信系统支持临床护理的准备情况相关:对技术和国民健康服务体系“健康连线”的看法;与资源相关的问题;患者选择;与保密和安全相关的事项;政治压力;以及信息技术目前在基层医疗中的使用方式。

结论

在研究开展之时,除质量管理与分析系统(QMAS)外,国民健康服务体系“健康连线”项目的其他系统在整个基层医疗信托基金中并未全面实施。研究中的所有诊所都认可新技术会给工作场所带来的益处,但也存在一些共同担忧,这表明基层医疗诊所的工作人员尚未做好开展电子健康的准备。国民健康服务体系“健康连线”项目的成功实施取决于识别、承认并克服这些担忧。对于那些在使用电子邮件或向电子病历过渡方面进展甚微的诊所,可能需要采取不同的方法。本研究表明,对技术的不信任以及对全面计算机化带来的繁重初始工作量的担忧,使一些诊所不愿接受电子健康。如果国民健康服务体系“健康连线”项目要取得成功,实施团队可能需要首先关注那些一直不愿使用技术来支持临床护理和诊所日常工作的诊所。

相似文献

1
Is primary care ready to embrace e-health? A qualitative study of staff in a London primary care trust.初级保健机构准备好接纳电子健康了吗?一项针对伦敦一家初级保健信托机构员工的定性研究。
Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(2):121-31. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v14i2.622.
2
Staff perceptions of a Productive Community Services implementation: A qualitative interview study.工作人员对生产性社区服务实施的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1052-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
Adoption and perception of electronic clinical communications in Scotland.苏格兰对电子临床通信的采用与认知。
Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(2):97-104. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v13i2.586.
4
Reorganising hospitals to implement a patient-centered model of care: Effects on clinical practice and professional relationships in the Italian NHS.重组医院以实施以患者为中心的护理模式:对意大利国民健康服务体系中临床实践和专业关系的影响。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):848-73. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2014-0129.
5
Patient, staff, and clinician perspectives on implementing electronic communications in an interdisciplinary rural family health practice.患者、工作人员和临床医生对在农村跨学科家庭健康实践中实施电子通信的看法。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):149-160. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000414. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among twelve ambulatory practices.十二家门诊机构电子处方实施情况的差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):364-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0494-8.
7
Towards efficient guidelines: how to monitor guideline use in primary care.迈向高效指南:如何监测基层医疗中指南的使用情况。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(18):iii, 1-97. doi: 10.3310/hta7180.
8
Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts.实施英国国家医疗服务体系信息技术项目:对急症信托进展情况的定性研究
BMJ. 2007 Jun 30;334(7608):1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551. Epub 2007 May 17.
9
10
Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.为什么电子健康计划难以实施?一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Implementation of a Patient-Centric Digital Health Application for Primary Healthcare in India.利益相关者对印度初级医疗保健中以患者为中心的数字健康应用实施情况的看法。
Healthc Inform Res. 2021 Oct;27(4):315-324. doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
2
Health providers' readiness for electronic health records adoption: A cross-sectional study of two hospitals in northern Ghana.卫生提供者对电子健康记录采用的准备情况:加纳北部两家医院的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0231569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231569. eCollection 2020.
3
Narrative Review for Exploring Barriers to Readiness of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Primary Health Care.
探索初级卫生保健中电子健康记录实施准备障碍的叙述性综述
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Jul;25(3):141-152. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.3.141. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Nurses' perceptions of the clinical information system in primary healthcare centres in Qatar: a cross-sectional survey.卡塔尔初级医疗保健中心护士对临床信息系统的认知:一项横断面调查
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100030.
5
Readiness of healthcare providers for eHealth: the case from primary healthcare centers in Lebanon.医疗服务提供者对电子健康的准备情况:黎巴嫩初级医疗保健中心的案例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1896-2.
6
Guided online self-management interventions in primary care: a survey on use, facilitators, and barriers.初级保健中的在线自我管理指导干预措施:关于使用情况、促进因素和障碍的调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 9;17:27. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0424-0.
7
Basic ICT adoption and use by general practitioners: an analysis of primary care systems in 31 European countries.全科医生对基本信息通信技术的采用与使用:对31个欧洲国家初级保健系统的分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Aug 22;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0185-z.
8
eHealth Technology Competencies for Health Professionals Working in Home Care to Support Older Adults to Age in Place: Outcomes of a Two-Day Collaborative Workshop.居家护理中支持老年人就地养老的健康专业人员的电子健康技术能力:为期两天的协作研讨会成果
Med 2 0. 2013 Sep 5;2(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/med20.2711. eCollection 2013 Jul-Dec.
9
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.比较用户群体对实施电子健康记录的障碍和促进因素的观点:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 28;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46.