Chu Baocheng, Phan Binh An P, Balu Niranjan, Yuan Chun, Brown B Greg, Zhao Xue-Qiao
Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(6):793-9. doi: 10.1080/10976640600777587.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can characterize carotid atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate reader agreement of carotid atherosclerotic lesion types by CMR.
Carotid arteries of 34 patients (29 men, 5 women; mean age, 53 years) were imaged on a 1.5-T scanner. Images with 4 contrast weightings (T1, T2, proton density, and 3-dimensional time-of-flight) were acquired on each axial slice of the carotid arteries. Modified AHA criteria were used for lesion type assessment on the 4 selected axial slices (1 from the common carotid artery, 1 from the carotid bifurcation, and 2 from the internal carotid artery). The modified AHA criteria are as follows: type I-II, near-normal wall thickness without calcification; type III, diffuse wall thickening or small eccentric plaque without calcification; type IV-V, plaque with a lipid rich necrotic core surrounded by fibrous tissue with possible calcification; type VI, complex plaque with a possible surface defect, hemorrhage, or thrombus; type VII, calcified plaque; and type VIII, fibrotic plaque without a lipid core and with possible small calcifications.
Of the 272 possible axial slices (34 patients x 2 arteries per patient x 4 slices per artery), 256 slices were available for lesion type assessment. The majority (94%) of the lesions were of type I-II and III. kappa was 0.80 and 0.60 for intra-reader and inter-reader agreement of lesion types, respectively. Inter-reader disagreement for type I-II and type III occurred in 82% of lesions. Weighted kappa was 0.92 and 0.83 for intra-reader and inter-reader agreement of lesion types, respectively.
The difference between type I-II and III lesions lies in the definition of the vessel wall. The moderate inter-reader agreement suggests further efforts such as establishment of normal carotid artery wall thickness by a quantitative measure are needed for carotid atherosclerotic lesion characterization.
心血管磁共振成像(CMR)能够对颈动脉粥样硬化进行特征性描述。本研究旨在评估通过CMR对颈动脉粥样硬化病变类型的阅片者间一致性。
对34例患者(29例男性,5例女性;平均年龄53岁)的颈动脉在1.5-T扫描仪上进行成像。在颈动脉的每个轴位切片上采集具有4种对比权重(T1、T2、质子密度和三维时间飞跃)的图像。采用改良的美国心脏协会(AHA)标准,对选取的4个轴位切片(1个来自颈总动脉,1个来自颈动脉分叉处,2个来自颈内动脉)上的病变类型进行评估。改良的AHA标准如下:I-II型,管壁厚度接近正常且无钙化;III型,弥漫性管壁增厚或小的偏心斑块且无钙化;IV-V型,富含脂质坏死核心的斑块,周围有纤维组织,可能有钙化;VI型,具有可能的表面缺损、出血或血栓的复杂斑块;VII型,钙化斑块;VIII型,无脂质核心且可能有小钙化的纤维斑块。
在272个可能的轴位切片(34例患者×每位患者2条动脉×每条动脉4个切片)中,256个切片可用于病变类型评估。大多数(94%)病变为I-II型和III型。阅片者内和阅片者间病变类型一致性的kappa值分别为0.80和0.60。I-II型和III型病变的阅片者间不一致发生在82%的病变中。阅片者内和阅片者间病变类型一致性的加权kappa值分别为0.92和0.83。
I-II型和III型病变的差异在于血管壁的定义。阅片者间一致性中等表明,需要进一步努力,如通过定量测量建立正常颈动脉壁厚度,以对颈动脉粥样硬化病变进行特征性描述。