• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终关怀中的慈善:公共资金变化对临终关怀护理的影响。

Charity at the deathbed: impacts of public funding changes on hospice care.

作者信息

Pietroburgo Julie

机构信息

Department of Public Administration and Policy Analysis, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois 62026-1457, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Jun-Jul;23(3):217-23. doi: 10.1177/1049909106289088.

DOI:10.1177/1049909106289088
PMID:17060282
Abstract

A core hospice value is caring for dying individuals regardless of their ability to pay. Historically, a stable source of government funding has provided the financial cushion necessary to extend care to indigent patients. Recently however, 2 factors have challenged the charitable-care value. First, financial reserves have been constrained by regulatory actions limiting admissions, lengths of stay, and reimbursement levels. Second, the number of uninsured individuals has increased. This study of hospices in 17 states found that hospices (1) remain committed to indigent care despite deep concerns about inadequate financial resources, (2) are encountering increased demand for services from indigent patients, (3) are currently covering indigent-care costs, but are pessimistic about their future ability to do so, and (4) are pursuing alternative funding with mixed results.

摘要

临终关怀的一个核心价值观是照顾濒死个体,无论其支付能力如何。从历史上看,稳定的政府资金来源提供了必要的经济缓冲,以便为贫困患者提供护理。然而,最近有两个因素对慈善护理价值观构成了挑战。首先,财务储备受到监管行动的限制,这些行动限制了入院人数、住院时间和报销水平。其次,未参保个体的数量有所增加。这项对17个州临终关怀机构的研究发现,临终关怀机构(1)尽管对资金不足深感担忧,但仍致力于贫困护理;(2)贫困患者对服务的需求不断增加;(3)目前正在承担贫困护理费用,但对未来承担这些费用的能力感到悲观;(4)正在寻求替代资金,结果喜忧参半。

相似文献

1
Charity at the deathbed: impacts of public funding changes on hospice care.临终关怀中的慈善:公共资金变化对临终关怀护理的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Jun-Jul;23(3):217-23. doi: 10.1177/1049909106289088.
2
Caring for the new uninsured: Hospital charity care for older people without coverage.关爱新出现的未参保者:医院为无医保的老年人提供慈善医疗服务。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Dec;54(12):1933-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00965.x.
3
Developing organizational charity-care policies and procedures.制定组织慈善护理政策和程序。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2002 Apr;56(4):52-7.
4
Who should pay for the uninsured?谁应该为未参保者付费?
Trustee. 2004 May;57(5):12-5.
5
Operational and financial performance of newly established hospices.新建临终关怀机构的运营和财务表现。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):259-66. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290245.
6
A proposal to redistribute the cost of hospital charity care.一项关于重新分配医院慈善护理费用的提议。
Milbank Q. 1991;69(1):113-42.
7
Factors affecting charity care and bad debt charges in Washington hospitals.影响华盛顿州医院慈善医疗及坏账费用的因素。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1994 Summer;39(2):179-91.
8
NHS and charitable funding for children and young people with cancer in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士为患有癌症的儿童和青少年提供的国民保健服务(NHS)及慈善资金。
J Child Health Care. 2008 Jun;12(2):156-68. doi: 10.1177/1367493508090173.
9
The trouble with uncompensated hospital care.未获补偿的医院护理问题。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1171-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048280.
10
The supply of charity services by nonprofit hospitals: motives and market structure.非营利性医院提供慈善服务:动机与市场结构
Rand J Econ. 1991 Autumn;22(3):430-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Merging the fields of mental health and social enterprise: lessons from abroad and cumulative findings from research with homeless youths.将心理健康和社会企业领域相结合:来自国外的经验教训和对无家可归青年的研究累积发现。
Community Ment Health J. 2012 Aug;48(4):490-502. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9440-7. Epub 2011 Oct 2.