• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概念的情境性本质。

The situated nature of concepts.

作者信息

Yeh Wenchi, Barsalou Lawrence W

机构信息

Hewlett-Packard Company, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2006 Fall;119(3):349-84.

PMID:17061691
Abstract

For decades the importance of background situations has been documented across all areas of cognition. Nevertheless, theories of concepts generally ignore background situations, focusing largely on bottom-up, stimulus-based processing. Furthermore, empirical research on concepts typically ignores background situations, not incorporating them into experimental designs. A selective review of relevant literatures demonstrates that concepts are not abstracted out of situations but instead are situated. Background situations constrain conceptual processing in many tasks (e.g., recall, recognition, categorization, lexical decision, color naming, property verification, property generation) across many areas of cognition (e.g., episodic memory, conceptual processing, visual object recognition, language comprehension). A taxonomy of situations is proposed in which grain size, meaningfulness, and tangibility distinguish the cumulative situations that structure cognition hierarchically.

摘要

几十年来,背景情境的重要性在认知的各个领域都有记载。然而,概念理论通常忽略背景情境,主要关注自下而上的、基于刺激的加工。此外,关于概念的实证研究通常也忽略背景情境,没有将其纳入实验设计。对相关文献的选择性综述表明,概念并非从情境中抽象出来,而是情境化的。背景情境在认知的许多领域(如情景记忆、概念加工、视觉物体识别、语言理解)的许多任务(如回忆、识别、分类、词汇判断、颜色命名、属性验证、属性生成)中制约着概念加工。本文提出了一种情境分类法,其中粒度、意义性和可触知性区分了分层构建认知的累积情境。

相似文献

1
The situated nature of concepts.概念的情境性本质。
Am J Psychol. 2006 Fall;119(3):349-84.
2
Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?语言影响的范围:分类系统会改变物体概念吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):485-501. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.485.
3
Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval.在概念的创建和检索中都会出现模态转换成本。
Cogn Sci. 2011 May-Jun;35(4):763-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01168.x. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
4
Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.范畴验证任务和词汇判断任务中的注意力与内隐记忆
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):662-79. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.662.
5
Conceptualization of perceptual attributes: a special case for color?感知属性的概念化:颜色的特殊情况?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Nov;80(3):289-314. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2634.
6
Reflections on how color term acquisition is constrained.关于颜色术语习得如何受到限制的思考。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;94(4):328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.02.004.
7
Thought before language.语言之前先有思想。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.09.004.
8
Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms.入门级分类过程中的客体知识在200毫秒后由内隐记忆激活并修改。
Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 15;44(4):1423-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.061. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
9
Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language and cognition.数字作为一种认知技术:来自毗拉哈语和认知的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):819-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
10
Analyzing feature distinctiveness in the processing of living and non-living concepts in Alzheimer's disease.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Nov;71(2):108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).道德判断的范畴化(MJAC)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):131-152. doi: 10.1177/1745691621990636. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
A Systems View of Emotion in Socio-political Context.社会政治背景下情绪的系统观。
Affect Sci. 2021;2(4):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00051-z. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies.揭示不一致性中的标准模糊性。
Open Mind (Camb). 2019 Jun;3:41-51. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00025.
4
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Stable and Flexible Semantic Typicality.稳定与灵活语义典型性的认知神经科学
Front Psychol. 2019 May 31;10:1265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01265. eCollection 2019.
5
Typicality: Stable structures and flexible functions.典型性:稳定的结构和灵活的功能。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):491-505. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1546-2.
6
Learning situated emotions.学习情境情绪。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Aug;145:106637. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
A contrastive account of explanation generation.解释生成的对比研究
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1387-1397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1349-x.
8
Graded Structure in Sexual Definitions: Categorizations of Having "Had Sex" and Virginity Loss Among Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women.性定义中的分级结构:同性恋和异性恋男性及女性中“有过性行为”和处女膜破裂的分类
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1653-1665. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0905-1. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation.仰望天空并看见一朵云:论事件与知觉模拟的相关性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):579-590. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000318. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Interplay Between the Object and Its Symbol: The Size-Congruency Effect.客体与其象征之间的相互作用:大小一致性效应。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;12(2):115-29. doi: 10.5709/acp-0191-7. eCollection 2016.