Alho Päivi Marjaana
J Anal Psychol. 2006 Nov;51(5):661-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2006.00626.x.
A much greater part of our identity than we generally believe is collectively determined. Awareness of the causal link between identity, its connected values and the influence exerted by these values on perception is therefore crucial. In the implicit personality model of Peabody and Goldberg (1989), the apparent wide variety of human characteristics is broken down into three broad dimensions: general evaluation, impulse control and assertiveness. My hypothesis is that the regulation of impulses can be equated with the Jungian concept of the mother and father complexes, and assertiveness with the relation between individualism and collectivism. I have utilized Montgomery's perspective theory and Jung's concepts of the union of opposites, the complex and the shadow in order to provide an alternative interpretation of the implicit personality model. According to my interpretation, the traditional values of any culture can be read against these three dimensions. These values can be seen as the greatest treasure of a culture but, at the same time, they can also be devastating if they become complex-like.
我们身份认同中比我们通常认为的大得多的部分是由集体决定的。因此，意识到身份认同、其相关价值观以及这些价值观对认知所施加的影响之间的因果联系至关重要。在皮博迪和戈德堡（1989年）的内隐人格模型中，人类特征表面上的广泛多样性被分解为三个宽泛的维度：总体评价、冲动控制和果敢性。我的假设是，冲动控制可以等同于荣格的父母情结概念，而果敢性可以等同于个人主义与集体主义之间的关系。我运用了蒙哥马利的视角理论以及荣格关于对立统一、情结和阴影的概念，以便对内隐人格模型提供一种不同的解释。根据我的解释，任何文化的传统价值观都可以对照这三个维度来解读。这些价值观可以被视为一种文化最宝贵的财富，但与此同时，如果它们变得像情结一样，也可能具有毁灭性。
