• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种修复材料对恒牙咬合面薄弱釉质支持作用的比较评估

A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth.

作者信息

Prabhakar A R, Thejokrishna P, Kurthukoti A J

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Sep;24(3):122-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.27892.

DOI:10.4103/0970-4388.27892
PMID:17065778
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the support to undermined occlusal enamel provided by posterior restorative composite (FiltekTM P60, 3M Dental products USA), polyacid modified resin composite (F2000 compomer, 3M Dental products, USA.), radiopaque silver alloy-glass ionomer cement (Miracle Mix. GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and Glass Ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP). To test each material, 20 human permanent mandibular third molars were selected. The lingual cusps were removed and the dentin supporting the facial cusps was cut away, leaving a shell of enamel. Each group of prepared teeth was restored using the materials according to the manufacturer's instructions. All the specimens were thermocycled (250 cycles, 6 degrees C- 60 degrees C, dwell time 30 seconds) and then mounted on an acrylic base. Specimens were loaded evenly across the cusp tips at a crosshead speed of 5 mm /minute in Hounsfield universal testing machine until fracture occurred. Data obtained was analyzed using analysis of variance and Studentized- Newman- Keul's range test. No significant differences were detected in the support provided by P-60, F 2000, Miracle Mix or Fuji IX GP groups. The support provided to undermined occlusal enamel by these materials was intermediate between no support and that provided by sound dentin. Without further development in dental material technology and evidence of its efficacy, restorative materials should not be relied upon to support undermined occlusal enamel to a level comparable to that provided by sound dentin.

摘要

本研究的目的是测试后牙修复用复合树脂(美国3M牙科产品公司的FiltekTM P60)、聚酸改性树脂复合体(美国3M牙科产品公司的F2000复合体)、不透射线的银合金玻璃离子水门汀(日本东京GC公司的Miracle Mix)和玻璃离子水门汀(富士IX GP)对牙合面釉质破坏区的支持作用。为测试每种材料,选取了20颗人类恒牙下颌第三磨牙。去除舌尖,并切除支持颊尖的牙本质,留下一层釉质壳。按照制造商的说明,使用这些材料对每组预备好的牙齿进行修复。所有标本进行热循环处理(250个循环,6℃ - 60℃,停留时间30秒),然后安装在丙烯酸基底上。在Hounsfield万能试验机上,以5毫米/分钟的十字头速度在牙尖顶端均匀加载标本,直至发生断裂。使用方差分析和Studentized - Newman - Keul's范围检验对获得的数据进行分析。在P - 60、F 2000、Miracle Mix或富士IX GP组提供的支持方面未检测到显著差异。这些材料对牙合面釉质破坏区提供的支持介于无支持和健康牙本质提供的支持之间。在牙科材料技术没有进一步发展及其有效性证据的情况下,不应依赖修复材料将牙合面釉质破坏区的支持水平提高到与健康牙本质相当的程度。

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth.四种修复材料对恒牙咬合面薄弱釉质支持作用的比较评估
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Sep;24(3):122-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.27892.
2
Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.修复材料对 undermined 咬合面牙釉质的支持作用。 (注:这里“undermined”可能有误,推测可能是“undermined”,意为“被破坏的、受损的” ,如果不是此词请根据正确的词汇准确理解。)
Quintessence Int. 2001 Apr;32(4):287-91.
3
Support of occlusal enamel provided by bonded restorations.
Oper Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-53.
4
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.硅酸三钙基修复材料与不透射线的后牙玻璃离子修复水门汀在乳牙和恒牙中抗剪切粘结强度及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Oct-Dec;32(4):304-10. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.140952.
5
Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.采用共固化与预固化技术应用的光固化树脂和树脂改性玻璃离子牙本质粘结剂的微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):292-8.
6
Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.V类树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合体修复体的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):610-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70217-9.
7
Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.可流动复合树脂、复合体和玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘结强度及微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x.
8
Effect of antibacterial varnishes applied to root dentin on shear bond strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.应用于牙根牙本质的抗菌清漆对牙齿颜色修复材料剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):65-71. doi: 10.2341/07-38.
9
Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.乳牙激光预处理釉质和牙本质对不同修复材料微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998 Summer;22(4):285-91.
10
Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.修整技术对树脂改性玻璃离子修复材料微渗漏及表面质地的影响。
J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):367-73. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00075-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Zirconia-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement's Effectiveness in Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀在龋齿治疗中有效性的综合评价:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;11(9):211. doi: 10.3390/dj11090211.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An Study.三种不同玻璃离子水门汀在人工唾液中的吸附、溶解性和抗压强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):49-54. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1407. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Reinforcement of unsupported enamel by restorative materials and dentin bonding agents: an in vitro study.
修复材料和牙本质粘结剂对无支持釉质的增强作用:一项体外研究。
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Spring;7(2):84-8. Epub 2010 Jun 30.