• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Cold hardiness of Pinus ponderosa, P. banksian and P. tabulaeformis].

作者信息

Gong Yuehua, Zhou Yongxue, Fan Junfeng, Liu Yingzhou, Pang Kejia

机构信息

College of Life Science, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2006 Aug;17(8):1389-92.

PMID:17066689
Abstract

By the method of artificial freezing, this paper made a comparative study on the cold hardiness of Pinus ponderosa, P. banksiana and P. tabulaeformis, with their inherent mechanisms approached. The results showed that the cold hardiness of these three species was in the sequence of P. banksiana > P. tabulaeformis > P. ponderosa. P. banksiana had high bound water/free water ratio (7.0) and ABA content (164.3 microg x g(-1) FW) but low K+ (2450 microg x g(-1) DW) and soluble sugar (12.0%) , P. tabulaeformis had higher contents of ABA (95.8 microg x g(-1) FW), K+ (4538 microg x g(-1) DW) and soluble sugar (18.68%) but low bound water/free water ratio (2.58), while P. ponderosa had high soluble sugar content (18.05%) but low bound water/free water ratio (2.18) and K+ (2275 microg x g(-1) DW) and ABA (63.3 microg x g(-1) FW) contents. These differences might be the reasons resulting in the different cold hardiness of these three species. Low chlorophyll content and high carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio might also contribute to the cold hardiness of P. banksiana. Therefore, though the test species are all of cold hardiness, their inherent mechanisms may be different.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Cold hardiness of Pinus ponderosa, P. banksian and P. tabulaeformis].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2006 Aug;17(8):1389-92.
2
Photosynthetic performance of invasive Pinus ponderosa and Juniperus virginiana seedlings under gradual soil water depletion.在土壤水分逐渐亏缺下,入侵的火炬松和南方刺柏实生苗的光合性能。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Jul 1;12(4):668-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00251.x.
3
Life-history correlations with seasonal cold hardiness in maritime pine.海岸松生活史与季节性抗寒能力的相关性
Am J Bot. 2016 Dec;103(12):2126-2135. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600286. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland.半干旱草原中,入侵树种维吉尼亚杜松和西黄松以及两种优势C4草本植物水分吸收深度的季节性变化。
Tree Physiol. 2009 Feb;29(2):157-69. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn019. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
5
[Research advances in mathematical model of coniferous trees cold hardiness].[针叶树抗寒性数学模型的研究进展]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2007 Jul;18(7):1610-6.
6
[Photosynthetic physiological adaptabilities of Pinus tabulaeformis and Robinia pseudoacacia in the Loess Plateau].黄土高原油松和刺槐的光合生理适应性
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2007 Jan;18(1):16-22.
7
Cold hardiness of interspecific hybrids between Pinus strobus and P. wallichiana measured by post-freezing needle electrolyte leakage.通过冷冻后针叶电解质渗漏测定的美国白松与西藏白皮松种间杂种的抗寒性。
Tree Physiol. 2007 Feb;27(2):243-50. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.2.243.
8
13C discriminations of Pinus sylvestris vs. Pinus ponderosa at a dry site in Brandenburg (eastern Germany): 100-year growth comparison.德国东部勃兰登堡一个干旱地区欧洲赤松与西黄松的13C判别:100年生长比较
Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2007 Jun;43(2):117-28. doi: 10.1080/10256010701360322.
9
Pinus ponderosa: A checkered past obscured four species.西黄松:一段波折的历史掩盖了四个物种。
Am J Bot. 2017 Jan;104(1):161-181. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600336. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Relationships among cold hardiness, root growth potential and bud dormancy in three conifers.三种针叶树的抗寒性、根系生长潜力与芽休眠之间的关系
Tree Physiol. 1989 Sep;5(3):291-306. doi: 10.1093/treephys/5.3.291.