Suppr超能文献

预防原则与化学品监管:过去的成就与未来的可能性

The precautionary principle and chemicals regulation: past achievements and future possibilities.

作者信息

Løkke Søren

机构信息

Section for Technology, Environment, and Society, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Sep;13(5):342-9. doi: 10.1065/espr2006.06.312.

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: The paper investigates the development of the institutional basis for the present modes of chemicals regulation and management, with special attention to interrelations with the precautionary principle.

MAIN FEATURES

The paper elucidates on how the precautionary principle has been shaped in relation to chemicals regulation and management since Carson's Silent Spring (years before the principle was confirmed as a policy-principle in German and European legislation. Furthermore, it is examined how the precautionary principle interacted with the development of the present chemicals regulatory regime, in a complex interplay within the OECD and Member Countries. The present modes of precaution in the new EU chemical legislation--REACH--are investigated with respect to the precautionary principle, and tested against two contemporary problems; brominated flame retardants and endocrine disrupting substances.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrates the changing character of the integration of the precautionary principle. The main tendencies are from implicit to more explicit precaution and from a closed expert-orientation towards a more deliberative approach to scientific knowledge and uncertainty. The results demonstrate that the precautionary principle is manifest in both the design of the testing strategy and in policy provisions. In particular, the substitution of hazardous substances with less hazardous is important.

DISCUSSION

Despite explicit attention to the precautionary principle, is the present reformulation of the European Chemicals policy in danger of falling into loop-holes that equal problems related to the present regulation of existing chemicals? 'Precaution' has been reduced virtually to an abstract concept that is more or less devoid of practical meaning in the regulatory process.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation will require continued scrutiny in the future shaping of the REACH strategy.

PERSPECTIVES

Continued development of robust and precaution-based chemicals regulation will have to involve both new data-generation strategies and new forms of political decision-making, with special attention given to transparency and deliberative policymaking.

摘要

背景、目的与范围:本文探讨当前化学品监管与管理模式的制度基础的发展情况,特别关注其与预防原则的相互关系。

主要特点

本文阐明了自卡森的《寂静的春天》以来,预防原则在化学品监管与管理方面是如何形成的(该原则在德国和欧洲立法中被确认为政策原则之前数年)。此外,还研究了预防原则在经合组织及成员国的复杂互动中,是如何与当前化学品监管制度的发展相互作用的。针对预防原则,对欧盟新化学品立法——《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)中的现行预防模式进行了研究,并针对两个当代问题进行了检验;溴化阻燃剂和内分泌干扰物质。

结果

分析表明了预防原则整合的变化特征。主要趋势是从隐性预防转向更明确的预防,从以专家为导向的封闭模式转向对科学知识和不确定性采取更具审议性的方法。结果表明,预防原则在测试策略的设计和政策规定中都有体现。特别是,用危害较小的物质替代有害物质很重要。

讨论

尽管明确关注预防原则,但当前欧洲化学品政策的重新制定是否有陷入漏洞的风险,这些漏洞与现行现有化学品监管相关问题相当?“预防”实际上已沦为一个抽象概念,在监管过程中几乎没有实际意义。

结论

得出结论,在未来制定REACH战略时,预防原则在化学品监管中的作用将需要持续审查。

展望

持续发展稳健且基于预防的化学品监管将必须涉及新的数据生成策略和新的政治决策形式,尤其要关注透明度和审议性政策制定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验