• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dilemmas for clinicians in use of Community Treatment Orders.

作者信息

Mullen Richard, Dawson John, Gibbs Anita

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):535-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.09.002
PMID:17067674
Abstract

Clinicians who treat patients using Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) face many potential dilemmas in their relations with involuntary outpatients and the exercise of their powers. We compare the dilemmas identified in the literature with those reported by responsible clinicians in New Zealand (NZ). These clinicians experienced a number of well-known dilemmas, such as determining the right moment for a person's discharge from a CTO, but they seemed less troubled by some other difficulties than might be expected, usually because they considered involuntary outpatient treatment the best option for the patient or the best way to manage the risks involved. Further dilemmas were identified by the NZ clinicians that have not been widely discussed, concerning the proper scope of clinical authority over patients under CTOs and the decision to revoke involuntary outpatient status. In conclusion, some suggestions are made as to how clinicians might best manage the dilemmas involved.

摘要

相似文献

1
Dilemmas for clinicians in use of Community Treatment Orders.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):535-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
2
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
3
Community treatment orders in Australia: rates and patterns of use.澳大利亚的社区治疗令:使用率及使用模式
Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;20(6):478-82. doi: 10.1177/1039856212466159. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? - The experience of Western Australia and Nova Scotia.流行病学研究能否协助评估社区治疗令?——西澳大利亚州和新斯科舍省的经验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
5
Are consumers on community treatment orders informed of their legal and human rights? a West Australian study.接受社区治疗令的消费者是否了解他们的法律和人权?一项西澳大利亚州的研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2007.00509.x.
6
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.瑞士西部的社区治疗令:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
The relationship between mandated community treatment and perceived barriers to care in persons with severe mental illness.强制社区治疗与重症精神疾病患者所感知的就医障碍之间的关系。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):495-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Ambivalence about community treatment orders.对社区治疗令的矛盾态度。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2003 May-Jun;26(3):243-55. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(03)00035-9.
9
Community treatment orders and competence to consent.社区治疗令与同意能力。
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;17(4):273-8. doi: 10.1080/10398560902721572.
10
Best practices: Best practices in the use of involuntary outpatient treatment.最佳实践:非自愿门诊治疗的最佳实践。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(5):421-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20120p421.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' perspectives on human rights when coercion is used in psychiatry: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.护士视角下精神科强制医疗中的人权问题:一项定性证据的系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 9;8(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1224-0.
2
Community treatment orders in New Zealand.新西兰的社区治疗令。
Int Psychiatry. 2009 Jul 1;6(3):59-60. eCollection 2009 Jul.
3
How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.临床医生如何在抗栓治疗中对慢性完全闭塞病变做出决策:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Sep 22;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0230-2. eCollection 2018.
4
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub5.
5
Care planning for consumers on community treatment orders: an integrative literature review.社区治疗令下消费者的护理计划:一项综合文献综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1107-z.
6
Effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders: The International Evidence.社区治疗令的有效性:国际证据
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;61(1):15-24. doi: 10.1177/0706743715620415. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
7
"Care or control?": a qualitative study of staff experiences with outpatient commitment orders.“关怀还是管控?”:一项关于工作人员执行门诊强制治疗令经历的定性研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 May;51(5):747-55. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1193-8. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study.社区治疗令的患者、精神科医生及家庭护理人员体验:定性研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):1873-82. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0906-0. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
9
CTOs: what is the state of the evidence?慢性完全闭塞病变:证据现状如何?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):1861-71. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0839-7. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
10
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub3.