• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚的社区治疗令:使用率及使用模式

Community treatment orders in Australia: rates and patterns of use.

作者信息

Light Edwina, Kerridge Ian, Ryan Christopher, Robertson Michael

机构信息

Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;20(6):478-82. doi: 10.1177/1039856212466159. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1177/1039856212466159
PMID:23136187
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Community treatment orders (CTOs) allow clinicians to provide unconsented outpatient treatment to people living with mental illness. Though controversial and of uncertain efficacy, CTOs are used throughout Australia and internationally. We sought to determine the prevalence of CTO use in Australian states and territories, and to examine changes in the pattern of use over time.

METHOD

Australian state and territory mental health review tribunals and health departments were surveyed for the most recent annual data on the total number of CTOs made and the total number of individual people placed on a CTO.

RESULTS

Rates of CTO use range from 30.2 per 100,000 population (in Tasmania) to 98.8 per 100,000 population (in Victoria). Use of CTOs in Australia is high by world standards, appears to be increasing over time, and varies significantly across jurisdictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The high (by world standards), increasing and variable use of CTOs in Australia is concerning and raises important implications for mental health policymakers and legislators. Current mental health policy activity, particularly the new National Mental Health Commission, provides a unique opportunity to enhance transparency and accountability if regular and nationally uniform CTO data are collected and publically reported.

摘要

目标

社区治疗令允许临床医生对患有精神疾病的人进行未经同意的门诊治疗。尽管存在争议且疗效不确定,但社区治疗令在澳大利亚和国际上都有使用。我们试图确定澳大利亚各州和领地使用社区治疗令的患病率,并研究其使用模式随时间的变化。

方法

对澳大利亚各州和领地的心理健康审查法庭和卫生部门进行调查,以获取有关社区治疗令签发总数和被下达社区治疗令的个人总数的最新年度数据。

结果

社区治疗令的使用率从每10万人30.2例(塔斯马尼亚州)到每10万人98.8例(维多利亚州)不等。按照世界标准,澳大利亚社区治疗令的使用率较高,且似乎随时间推移而上升,不同司法管辖区之间存在显著差异。

结论

按照世界标准,澳大利亚社区治疗令的高使用率、上升趋势以及使用的差异性令人担忧,对心理健康政策制定者和立法者具有重要意义。如果收集并公开报告定期且全国统一的社区治疗令数据,当前的心理健康政策活动,特别是新成立的国家心理健康委员会,将提供一个提高透明度和问责制的独特机会。

相似文献

1
Community treatment orders in Australia: rates and patterns of use.澳大利亚的社区治疗令:使用率及使用模式
Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;20(6):478-82. doi: 10.1177/1039856212466159. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
2
Rates of use of community treatment orders in Australia.澳大利亚社区治疗令的使用情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
How shortcomings in the mental health system affect the use of involuntary community treatment orders.心理健康系统中的缺陷如何影响非自愿社区治疗令的使用。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):351-356. doi: 10.1071/AH16074.
4
Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? - The experience of Western Australia and Nova Scotia.流行病学研究能否协助评估社区治疗令?——西澳大利亚州和新斯科舍省的经验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
5
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
6
Dilemmas for clinicians in use of Community Treatment Orders.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):535-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
7
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.瑞士西部的社区治疗令:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
Community treatment orders and antipsychotic long-acting injections.社区治疗令与抗精神病长效注射剂
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2009 Nov;52:S57-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.195.52.s57.
9
Community treatment orders and Nova Scotia--the least restrictive alternative?社区治疗令与新斯科舍省——限制最少的选择?
Health Law J. 2003;11:1-33.
10
A comparison of health service use in two jurisdictions with and without compulsory community treatment.两个司法管辖区内接受和未接受强制社区治疗情况下的医疗服务使用情况比较。
Psychol Med. 2005 Sep;35(9):1357-67. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705004824.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits following community treatment orders have an inverse relationship with rates of use: meta-analysis and meta-regression.社区治疗令后的益处与使用率呈负相关:荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Apr 14;9(3):e68. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.28.
2
Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in New Zealand and the provision of care: An examination of national databases and predictors of outcome.新西兰的强制社区治疗令与护理提供:对国家数据库及结果预测因素的考察
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Sep 30;17:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100275. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Out-patient commitment order use in Norway: incidence and prevalence rates, duration and use of mental health services from the Norwegian Outpatient Commitment Study.
挪威门诊强制治疗令的使用情况:挪威门诊强制治疗研究中的发病率、患病率、持续时间及心理健康服务使用情况
BJPsych Open. 2019 Sep 2;5(5):e75. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.60.
4
Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making.社区治疗令与支持性决策制定。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00414. eCollection 2019.
5
Mental Health Consumers' Motives for Seeking Advocacy Support: A Qualitative Exploration.精神健康消费者寻求倡导支持的动机:一项定性探索
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0177-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub5.
7
Care planning for consumers on community treatment orders: an integrative literature review.社区治疗令下消费者的护理计划:一项综合文献综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1107-z.
8
A qualitative study examining the presence and consequences of moral framings in patients' and mental health workers' experiences of community treatment orders.一项定性研究,考察社区治疗令在患者及心理健康工作者经历中的道德框架的存在情况及后果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 6;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0653-0.
9
Community treatment orders in a Swedish county--applied as intended?瑞典一个郡的社区治疗令——是否按预期实施?
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Dec 6;7:879. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-879.
10
The epistemic challenges of CTOs: Commentary on . . . Community treatment orders.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的认知挑战:关于……社区治疗令的评论
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):6-8. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045732.