Suppr超能文献

欧洲一个独特地区的跨境急救发生率及心肺复苏结果

Incidence of cross-border emergency care and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a unique European region.

作者信息

Fries Michael, Beckers Stefan, Bickenbach Johannes, Skorning Max, Krug Svenja, Nilson Enno, Rossaint Rolf, Kuhlen Ralf

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2007 Jan;72(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical service (EMS) systems in Europe have developed differently due to legal, educational and organisational aspects. The aim of the present study was to compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes and characteristics in three differently organised and staffed EMS systems in close vicinity.

METHODS

We analysed the charts of patients treated in the EMS systems of the cities of Aachen (Germany), Heerlen (The Netherlands) and Eupen (Belgium), retrospectively. Main outcome measures were the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital discharge and cerebral performance after 1 year. Furthermore, factors influencing neurological outcome and the incidence of cross-border emergency assistance were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 852 patients found unresponsive with no palpable pulse and/or the absence of breathing, CPR was performed in 322 patients. The overall rate of ROSC was 44.1 and 13.7% of patients were discharged alive. A good neurological outcome was observed in 95.5% of survivors. The rate of ventricular fibrillation was significantly higher (46.9% versus 21.9 and 21.2%, p < 0.05) and the total amount of epinephrine given during CPR significantly lower (4.5+/-5.2 mg versus 9.8+/-10.8 and 8.4+/-6.2 mg, p < 0.05) in the Dutch system. No significant differences in outcome variables were observed between the systems. Neurological outcome was favourable when the arrest was witnessed, occurred in a public place, the initial rhythm was shockable, a low total amount of adrenaline (epinephrine) was given and the call-response interval was short. In 1.2% of the cases cross-border emergency care was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite medical and organisational discrepancies, outcomes of CPR in three neighbouring EMS systems are comparable. Neurological outcome is influenced by demographical, organisational and medical factors. Cross-border emergency assistance for CPR is almost undetectable and needs improvement.

摘要

背景

由于法律、教育和组织等方面的原因,欧洲的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统发展各异。本研究的目的是比较附近三个组织形式和人员配备不同的EMS系统中的心肺复苏(CPR)结果及特征。

方法

我们对德国亚琛市、荷兰海尔伦市和比利时欧本市的EMS系统所治疗患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。主要结局指标为自主循环恢复(ROSC)率、1年后的出院情况及脑功能。此外,还评估了影响神经功能结局的因素以及跨境紧急救援的发生率。

结果

在852例被发现无反应且无脉搏及/或无呼吸的患者中,322例接受了CPR。ROSC的总体发生率为44.1%,13.7%的患者存活出院。95.5%的幸存者神经功能结局良好。荷兰系统中的室颤发生率显著更高(46.9% 对比21.9%和21.2%,p < 0.05),且CPR期间给予的肾上腺素总量显著更低(4.5±5.2 mg对比9.8±10.8 mg和8.4±6.2 mg,p < 0.05)。各系统之间在结局变量方面未观察到显著差异。当心脏骤停为目击事件、发生在公共场所、初始心律可电击复律、给予的肾上腺素(epinephrine)总量较低且呼叫 - 响应间隔较短时,神经功能结局较好。在1.2%的病例中提供了跨境紧急护理。

结论

尽管存在医疗和组织方面的差异,但三个相邻EMS系统中的CPR结果具有可比性。神经功能结局受人口统计学、组织和医疗因素影响。CPR的跨境紧急救援几乎难以察觉,需要改进。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验