Ko Yu, Abarca Jacob, Malone Daniel C, Dare Donna C, Geraets Doug, Houranieh Antoun, Jones William N, Nichol W Paul, Schepers Gregory P, Wilhardt Michelle
College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Drachman B307F, 1295 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85721-0207, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2224. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts.
A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States.
A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts.
The overall response rate was 40% (prescribers: 36%; pharmacists: 59%). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61%) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30% of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73% and 82%, respectively) and more detailed information (65% and 89%, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62% and 55%, respectively) and DDI information (51% and 79%, respectively).
Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.
评估退伍军人事务部(VA)开处方者和药剂师对计算机生成的药物相互作用(DDI)警报的看法,并获取改进DDI警报的建议。
对美国七个VA医疗中心的725名开处方者和142名药剂师进行邮件调查。
一份问卷询问了受访者关于他们获取药物和DDI信息的来源、对住院和门诊综合计算机开处方者医嘱录入(CPOE)系统的满意度、对DDI警报的态度以及改进DDI警报的建议。
总体回复率为40%(开处方者:36%;药剂师:59%)。开处方者和药剂师均表示CPOE系统对他们的工作有中性到积极的影响。DDI警报未被视为浪费时间,大多数(61%)开处方者认为DDI警报增加了他们安全开处方的可能性。然而,只有30%的开处方者认为DDI警报在大多数时候为他们提供了最需要的信息。开处方者和药剂师都认为DDI警报应伴有处理方法(分别为73%和82%)和更详细的信息(分别为65%和89%)。当被问及改进DDI警报的建议时,开处方者最喜欢包括处理选项,而药剂师最喜欢使致命相互作用更难被忽略。开处方者和药剂师报告主要依靠电子参考文献获取一般药物信息(分别为62%和55%)和DDI信息(分别为51%和79%)。
受访者对CPOE对其工作的影响表示中性到积极的看法。他们的意见表明DDI警报是有用的,但仍需要额外的工作来提高其临床实用性。