Ash Joan S, Sittig Dean F, Seshadri Veena, Dykstra Richard H, Carpenter James D, Stavri P Zoe
Oregon Health and Science University, School of Medicine, BICC, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA.
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.005.
The research questions, strategies, and results of a 7-year qualitative study of computerized physician order entry implementation (CPOE) at successful sites are reviewed over time. The iterative nature of qualitative inquiry stimulates a consecutive stream of research foci, which, with each iteration, add further insight into the overarching research question. A multidisciplinary team of researchers studied CPOE implementation in four organizations using a multi-method approach to address the question "what are the success factors for implementing CPOE?" Four major themes emerged after studying three sites; ten themes resulted from blending the first results with those from a fourth site; and twelve principles were generated when results of a qualitative analysis of consensus conference transcripts were combined with the field data. The study has produced detailed descriptions of factors related to CPOE success and insight into the implementation process.
本文回顾了一项为期7年的定性研究,该研究对成功实施计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)的机构进行了跟踪,涉及研究问题、策略及结果。定性研究的迭代性质催生了一系列连续的研究重点,每一次迭代都为总体研究问题带来了更深入的见解。一个多学科研究团队采用多方法途径,对四个机构的CPOE实施情况展开研究,以回答“CPOE实施的成功因素有哪些?”这一问题。在研究了三个机构后,出现了四个主要主题;将第一批结果与来自第四个机构的结果相结合后,产生了十个主题;在将共识会议记录的定性分析结果与实地数据相结合时,得出了十二条原则。该研究详细描述了与CPOE成功相关的因素,并深入洞察了实施过程。