Montgomery-Downs Hawley E, Gozal David
West Virginia University, Department of Psychology, 1130 Life Sciences Building, PO Box 6040, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040, USA.
Sleep. 2006 Oct;29(10):1282-7. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.10.1282.
Childhood sleep disorders are consistently shown to affect behavior and cognition, but first-night effects on these measures are generally unknown. We sought to examine how sleep in the home versus the laboratory differed among healthy toddlers and how such differences relate to standardized scores on assessments the morning following polysomnography.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy 14-month-olds wore actigraphs during nighttime sleep at home for 5 nights preceding and during standard overnight laboratory polysomnography. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II) were administered once the morning after polysomnography.
All subjects had normal polysomnography. Sleep-start times at home and during polysomnography did not differ, whereas, during polysomnography, subjects awoke earlier (p = .008, d = .58), their total sleep time (p <. 001, d = 1.1) and sleep efficiency (p = .004, d = .57) were reduced, and they had shorter sleep-bout lengths (p = .004, d = .03), less immobility (p = .003, d = .62), and greater average activity during sleep (p <. 001, d = .98). Standardized assessments were not affected by differences between home and polysomnography night sleep, but children with greater emotional regulation difficulty had a lower percentage of immobility (r = -0.67, p = .001) and increased sleep fragmentation (r = -0.60, p = .005) during polysomnography.
Although sleep-onset times were preserved, sleep in the laboratory was disrupted, compared with at home. These differences did not affect standardized scores, but the magnitude of the difference was associated with worse emotional regulation. The effects of sleep disturbance during polysomnography, or the influence of poor emotional regulation on sleep in the laboratory, should be considered in studies of young children.
儿童睡眠障碍一直被证明会影响行为和认知,但这些指标的首夜效应通常尚不清楚。我们试图研究健康幼儿在家中与实验室中的睡眠有何不同,以及这些差异与多导睡眠图检查后次日早晨评估的标准化分数有何关联。
设计、地点和参与者:20名健康的14个月大婴儿在标准的夜间实验室多导睡眠图检查之前和期间,在家中夜间睡眠时佩戴活动记录仪5晚。多导睡眠图检查后的次日早晨,对其进行贝利婴儿发展量表(BSID-II)测试。
所有受试者的多导睡眠图检查结果均正常。在家中和多导睡眠图检查期间的入睡时间没有差异,然而,在多导睡眠图检查期间,受试者醒来更早(p = 0.008,d = 0.58),总睡眠时间(p < 0.001,d = 1.1)和睡眠效率(p = 0.004,d = 0.57)降低,睡眠周期长度更短(p = 0.004,d = 0.03),静止不动时间更少(p = 0.003,d = 0.62),睡眠期间的平均活动量更大(p < 0.001,d = 0.98)。标准化评估不受家中睡眠与多导睡眠图检查夜间睡眠差异的影响,但情绪调节困难较大的儿童在多导睡眠图检查期间静止不动的百分比更低(r = -0.67,p = 0.001),睡眠碎片化增加(r = -0.60,p = 0.005)。
尽管入睡时间保持不变,但与在家中相比,实验室中的睡眠受到了干扰。这些差异并未影响标准化分数,但差异的程度与较差的情绪调节有关。在幼儿研究中,应考虑多导睡眠图检查期间睡眠干扰的影响,或情绪调节不良对实验室睡眠的影响。