Suppr超能文献

打鼾和不打鼾的 3 岁儿童家庭生理睡眠测量的可靠性。

Reliability of home-based physiological sleep measurements in snoring and non-snoring 3-year olds.

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2013 Mar;17(1):147-56. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0663-9. Epub 2012 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To study snoring and non-snoring 3-year olds in their own homes and to establish reference values and night-to-night variability of physiological measurements taken during sleep.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-six children, aged 3.2-4.0 years, identified as at high (n = 83, M/F = 1.5:1) or low (n = 83, M/F = 1.4:1) risk for persistent snoring, as rated by a parent, wore a sleep screening system (Grey Flash) for up to five consecutive nights, to measure snoring, oxygen saturation, heart rate, movement, sleep efficiency, and sleep timing.

RESULTS

The snoring group snored 25% of their total sleep time, while the non-snoring group snored just 7.6%. Reliability estimates were calculated, using intraclass correlations to establish the reliability of single recordings and the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula to estimate reliability over multiple recordings. Snoring (percent), turn index (number of turns per hour), and mean heart rate were adequately assessed in both groups with one recording night (all intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ≥0.70). Furthermore, mean SpO(2) was measured with sufficient reliability with two recordings in non-snorers (ICC = 0.71), while five recording nights were necessary to reach reliability in snorers (ICC = 0.71). SpO(2) nadir did not reach adequate reliability in either group even after seven recording nights.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that snoring can be measured reliably at home with just one recording night, whereas most other physiological sleep measures require two or more recordings.

摘要

目的

在儿童自己家中研究打鼾和不打鼾的 3 岁儿童,并建立睡眠期间生理测量的参考值和夜间变异性。

方法

166 名年龄在 3.2-4.0 岁的儿童,根据父母的评估,分为高(n=83,男/女=1.5:1)或低(n=83,男/女=1.4:1)持续性打鼾风险组,佩戴睡眠筛查系统(Grey Flash)连续五晚,以测量打鼾、氧饱和度、心率、运动、睡眠效率和睡眠时间。

结果

打鼾组的总睡眠时间中有 25%是打鼾,而非打鼾组仅打鼾 7.6%。使用组内相关系数计算可靠性估计值,以建立单次记录的可靠性,并使用 Spearman-Brown 预测公式估计多次记录的可靠性。在两组中,单次记录夜即可充分评估打鼾(百分比)、翻身指数(每小时翻身次数)和平均心率(所有组内相关系数(ICC)≥0.70)。此外,非打鼾者两次记录即可充分可靠地测量平均 SpO2(ICC=0.71),而打鼾者则需要五次记录夜才能达到可靠性(ICC=0.71)。即使进行了七次记录夜,SpO2 最低点在两组中均未达到足够的可靠性。

结论

我们的结果表明,仅用一次记录夜即可在家中可靠地测量打鼾,而大多数其他生理睡眠测量则需要两次或更多次记录。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验