Brown Peter R, Tuan Nguyen Phu, Singleton Grant R, Ha Phi Thi Thu, Hoa Phung Thi, Hue Dao Thi, Tan Tran Quang, Van Tuat Nguyen, Jacob Jens, Müller Warren J
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2006 Oct;16(5):2000-10. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2000:ebmori]2.0.co;2.
Rodents cause significant damage to lowland irrigated rice crops in the Red River Delta of Vietnam. A four-year study was conducted in 1999-2002 to examine the effectiveness of applying rodent control practices using the principles of ecologically based pest management. Four 100-150 ha study sites adjacent to villages were selected and farmers on two treated sites were asked to follow a set of rodent management practices, while farmers on the untreated sites were asked not to change their typical practices. Farmers on the treated sites were encouraged to use trap-barrier systems (TBS's; 0.065-ha early planted crop surrounded by a plastic fence with multiple capture traps; one TBS for every 10-15 ha), to work together over large areas by destroying burrows in refuge habitats soon after planting (before the rats reestablish in the fields and before the onset of breeding), synchronizing planting and harvesting of the their rice crops, cleaning up weeds and piles of straw, and keeping bund (embankment) size small (<30 cm) to prevent burrowing. A 75% reduction in the use of rodenticides and plastic barrier fences (without traps or an early crop) was achieved on treated sites. The abundance of rodents was low after implementation of the management practices across all sites. There was no evidence for an effect of treatment on the abundance of rodents captured each month using live-capture traps, and no difference in damage between treatments or in yields obtained from the rice crops. Therefore, ecologically based rodent management was equally effective as typical practices for rodent management. Farmers on the treated sites spent considerably less money applying rodent control practices, which was reflected in the comparative increase in the partial benefit:cost of applying ecologically based rodent management from 3:1 on treated sites and untreated sites prior to the implementation of treatments to 17:1 on treated sites in the final year of the project.
啮齿动物对越南红河三角洲的低地灌溉稻田造成了严重破坏。1999年至2002年进行了一项为期四年的研究,以检验运用基于生态的害虫管理原则实施灭鼠措施的效果。选择了四个毗邻村庄、面积为100 - 150公顷的研究地点,要求两个实施处理地点的农民遵循一套灭鼠管理措施,而未处理地点的农民则被要求不改变其常规做法。鼓励实施处理地点的农民使用诱捕屏障系统(TBS;0.065公顷早播作物被带有多个捕获陷阱的塑料围栏包围;每10 - 15公顷设置一个TBS),在种植后不久(在老鼠重新在田间定居之前以及繁殖开始之前)通过破坏避难栖息地的洞穴在大面积区域协同作业,使他们的水稻作物种植和收获同步,清理杂草和稻草堆,并保持田埂(堤坝)尺寸较小(<30厘米)以防止打洞。在实施处理的地点,灭鼠剂和塑料屏障围栏(不带陷阱或早播作物)的使用量减少了75%。在所有地点实施管理措施后,啮齿动物的数量都很低。没有证据表明处理对每月使用活捉陷阱捕获的啮齿动物数量有影响,处理之间的损害以及水稻作物的产量没有差异。因此,基于生态的啮齿动物管理与典型的啮齿动物管理措施同样有效。实施处理地点的农民在应用灭鼠措施上花费的钱要少得多,这反映在部分效益成本的比较增加上:从项目实施前处理地点和未处理地点的3:1增加到项目最后一年处理地点的17:1。