Bell Matthew C, Seip Katharine M, Fitzsimmons Kathleen S
Psychology Department, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA.
Behav Processes. 2007 Jan 10;74(1):33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
This study evaluated the effect of a signal on resistance to change using a multiple schedule of reinforcement. Experiment 1 presented pigeons with three schedules: a signaled delay to reinforcement schedule (a two-link chain schedule with a variable-interval 120-s initial link followed by a 5-s fixed-time schedule), an unsignaled delay schedule (a comparable two-link tandem schedule), and an immediate, zero-delay variable-interval 125-s schedule. Two separate disruption procedures assessed resistance to change: extinction and adding a variable-time 20-s schedule of reinforcement to the inter-component interval. Resistance to change tests were conducted twice, once with the signal stimulus (the terminal link of the chain schedule) present and once with it absent. Results from both disruption procedures showed that signal absence reduced resistance to change for the pre-signal stimulus. In probe choice tests subjects strongly preferred the signal stimulus over the unsignaled stimulus and exhibited no reliable preference when given a choice between the signal stimulus and immediate stimulus. Experiment 2 presented two equal signaled schedules where, during resistance to change tests, the signal remained for one schedule and was removed for the second. Resistance to change was consistently lower when the signal was absent.
本研究使用多重强化程序评估了一种信号对改变阻力的影响。实验1向鸽子呈现了三种程序:有信号的强化延迟程序(一种双链接链式程序,初始链接为可变间隔120秒,随后是5秒固定时间程序)、无信号的延迟程序(一种类似的双链接串联程序)以及即时的、零延迟的可变间隔125秒程序。两种独立的干扰程序评估了对改变的阻力:消退以及在组件间间隔添加可变时间20秒的强化程序。改变阻力测试进行了两次,一次在信号刺激(链式程序的终端链接)存在时进行,一次在其不存在时进行。两种干扰程序的结果均表明,无信号会降低对信号前刺激的改变阻力。在探测选择测试中,与无信号刺激相比,受试对象强烈偏好信号刺激,而在信号刺激和即时刺激之间进行选择时,未表现出可靠的偏好。实验2呈现了两个相等的有信号程序,在改变阻力测试期间,信号在一个程序中保留,而在第二个程序中被移除。无信号时,改变阻力始终较低。