Barringer Michael L, Thomason Michael H, Kilgo Patrick, Spallone Linda
Department of Surgery, Cleveland Regional Medical Center, 200 W. Grover St., Shelby, NC 28150, USA.
Am J Surg. 2006 Nov;192(5):685-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.11.006.
BACKGROUND: Trauma systems decrease morbidity and mortality of injured populations, and each component contributes to the final outcome. This study evaluated the association between a referring hospital's trauma designation and the survival and resource utilization of patients transferred to a level I trauma center. METHODS: Data from the Registry of the American College of Surgeons on patients transferred to a level I trauma center during a 7-year period were subdivided into 3 categories: group 1 = level III-designated trauma center; group 2 = potential level III trauma centers; and group 3 = other transferring hospitals. Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology was used to provide a probability estimate of survival adjusted for the effect related to injury severity, physiologic host factors, and age. A W statistic was calculated for each type of referring hospital so that comparisons between observed survival and predicted survival could be measured. Differences in W, length of stay, intensive care unit days, and ventilator days were examined using general linear models. RESULTS: Patients transferred to a level I from a level III trauma center (group 1) were more seriously injured (P < .0001) and had improved survival (P < .0018) compared with those transferred from nondesignated hospitals (groups 2 and 3). Patients transferred from large nondesignated hospitals (group 2) had outcomes similar to patients transferred from all other hospitals (group 3). Level I hospital resource utilization did not show significant differences based on referring hospital type. COMMENTS: Outcomes of patients in a trauma system are associated with trauma-center designation of the referring hospitals.
背景:创伤系统可降低受伤人群的发病率和死亡率,且每个组成部分都对最终结果有影响。本研究评估了转诊医院的创伤指定与转至一级创伤中心的患者的生存率和资源利用之间的关联。 方法:美国外科医师学会登记处关于7年内转至一级创伤中心的患者的数据被分为3类:第1组 = 指定为三级的创伤中心;第2组 = 潜在的三级创伤中心;第3组 = 其他转诊医院。采用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法,以提供针对与损伤严重程度、生理宿主因素和年龄相关的影响进行调整后的生存概率估计。为每种类型的转诊医院计算W统计量,以便能够衡量观察到的生存率与预测生存率之间的差异。使用一般线性模型检查W、住院时间、重症监护病房天数和呼吸机使用天数的差异。 结果:与从非指定医院(第2组和第3组)转诊的患者相比,从三级创伤中心(第1组)转至一级创伤中心的患者受伤更严重(P < .0001),且生存率有所提高(P < .0018)。从大型非指定医院(第2组)转诊的患者的结局与从所有其他医院(第3组)转诊的患者相似。一级医院的资源利用情况根据转诊医院类型未显示出显著差异。 评论:创伤系统中患者的结局与转诊医院的创伤中心指定有关。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2025-4
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025-1-16
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2013-7
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010-3-16
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009-2