• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自农村三级医院的外科创伤转诊病例:我们的社区同事应该做得更多还是更少?

Surgical trauma referrals from rural level III hospitals: should our community colleagues be doing more, or less?

作者信息

Ball Chad G, Sutherland Francis R, Dixon Elijah, Feliciano David V, Datta Indraneel, Rajani Ravi R, Hannay Scott, Gomes Anthony, Kirkpatrick Andrew W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1):180-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a595c3.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a595c3
PMID:19590332
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural citizens die more frequently because of trauma than their urban counterparts. Skill maintenance is a potential issue among rural surgeons because of infrequent exposure to severely injured patients. The primary goal was to evaluate the outcomes of multiple injuries patients who required a laparotomy after referral from level III trauma centers.

METHODS

All severely injured patients (injury severity score >12) referred to a level I trauma center from level III hospitals, during a 48-month period were evaluated. Comparisons between referrals (level III and IV) as well as survivors and nonsurvivors used standard statistical methodology.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred and thirty patients (35%) were transferred from level III (33%) and level IV (67%) centers (43% underwent an operative procedure). Only 13% required a laparotomy, whereas 87% needed procedures from other subspecialists. Referred patients had a mean injury severity score of 28, length of stay of 28 days, and mortality rate of 26%. More patients arrived hemodynamically unstable from level IV (55%) versus level III (35%) hospitals (p < 0.05). Nonsurvivors from level III centers were more likely to transfer via aircraft (100%) than from level IV hospitals (55%) (p < 0.05). Most (91%) definitive general surgery procedures could have been completed by surgeons at level III centers; however, 90% also had multisystem injuries requiring treatment by other subspecialists.

CONCLUSIONS

Most severely injured patient referrals from level III and IV trauma centers in Western Canada are appropriate. The lack of consistent subspecialty coverage mandates most transfers from level III hospitals. This data will be used to engage rural Alberta physicians in an educational outreach program.

摘要

背景

农村居民因创伤死亡的频率高于城市居民。由于很少接触重伤患者,农村外科医生的技能维持是一个潜在问题。主要目标是评估从三级创伤中心转诊后需要剖腹手术的多发伤患者的治疗结果。

方法

对在48个月期间从三级医院转诊至一级创伤中心的所有重伤患者(损伤严重度评分>12)进行评估。使用标准统计方法对转诊医院(三级和四级)以及幸存者和非幸存者进行比较。

结果

1230名患者(35%)从三级(33%)和四级(67%)中心转诊而来(43%接受了手术)。仅13%的患者需要剖腹手术,而87%的患者需要其他专科医生进行手术。转诊患者的平均损伤严重度评分为28分,住院时间为28天,死亡率为26%。与三级医院(35%)相比,从四级医院转诊来的血流动力学不稳定患者更多(55%)(p<0.05)。三级中心的非幸存者通过飞机转诊的可能性(100%)高于四级医院(55%)(p<0.05)。大多数(91%)确定性普外科手术本可由三级中心的外科医生完成;然而,90%的患者也有多系统损伤,需要其他专科医生进行治疗。

结论

加拿大西部三级和四级创伤中心转诊的大多数重伤患者是合适的。由于缺乏持续的专科覆盖,大多数患者从三级医院转诊。这些数据将用于让阿尔伯塔省农村地区的医生参与一个教育推广项目。

相似文献

1
Surgical trauma referrals from rural level III hospitals: should our community colleagues be doing more, or less?来自农村三级医院的外科创伤转诊病例:我们的社区同事应该做得更多还是更少?
J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1):180-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a595c3.
2
A population-based survival assessment of categorizing level III and IV rural hospitals as trauma centers.基于人群的分类 III 级和 IV 级农村医院为创伤中心的生存评估。
J Rural Health. 2009 Spring;25(2):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00215.x.
3
Improving outcomes in a regional trauma system: impact of a level III trauma center.改善区域创伤系统的治疗效果:三级创伤中心的影响
Am J Surg. 2006 Nov;192(5):685-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.11.006.
4
Trauma care at rural level III trauma centers in a state trauma system.某州创伤系统中农村三级创伤中心的创伤护理
J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):498-503. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197671.00818.76.
5
The effect of interfacility transfer on outcome in an urban trauma system.城市创伤系统中机构间转运对治疗结果的影响。
J Trauma. 2003 Sep;55(3):444-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000047809.64699.59.
6
Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured?包容性创伤系统:它们能改善重伤患者的分诊或治疗结果吗?
J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):529-35; discussion 535-37. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000204022.36214.9e.
7
Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.一级创伤中心与二级创伤中心:基于结果的评估。
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1321-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181929e2b.
8
Effect of teleradiology upon pattern of transfer of head injured patients from a rural general hospital to a neurosurgical referral centre.远程放射学对头部受伤患者从农村综合医院转至神经外科转诊中心模式的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Aug;24(8):550-2. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.044461.
9
Trauma systems and timing of patient transfer: are we improving?创伤系统与患者转运时机:我们是否在进步?
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):465-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.013.
10
Time to definitive care for patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury--does a trauma system matter?中度和重度创伤性脑损伤患者获得确定性治疗的时间——创伤系统重要吗?
N Z Med J. 2009 Sep 11;122(1302):40-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the Canadian rural general surgeon.定义加拿大农村普外科医生。
Can J Surg. 2024 Mar 28;67(2):E129-E141. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002123. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
2
Addition of a general surgeon without addition of appropriate support is inadequate to improve outcomes of trauma patients in a rural setting: a cohort study of 1962 consecutive patients.在农村地区,仅增加一名普通外科医生而不提供适当支持,不足以改善创伤患者的治疗结果:一项对1962例连续患者的队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):835-839. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0736-8. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
The cost effectiveness of early management of acute appendicitis underlies the importance of curative surgical services to a primary healthcare programme.
急性阑尾炎早期治疗的成本效益体现了根治性外科手术服务对初级医疗保健计划的重要性。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 May;95(4):280-4. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609958415.