First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Mar 16;18:14. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-14.
BACKGROUND: Quality assessment of any trauma system involves the evaluation of the transferring patterns. This study aims to assess interfacility transfers in the absence of a formal trauma system setting and to estimate the benefits from implementing a more organized structure. METHODS: The 'Report of the Epidemiology and Management of Trauma in Greece' is a one year project of trauma patient reporting throughout the country. It provided data concerning the patterns of interfacility transfers. We compared the transferred patient group to the non transferred patient group. Information reviewed included patient and injury characteristics, need for an operation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admittance and mortality. Analysis employed descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Interfacility transfers were then assessed according to each health care facility's availability of five requirements; Computed Tomography scanner, ICU, neurosurgeon, orthopedic and vascular surgeon. RESULTS: Data on 8,524 patients were analyzed; 86.3% were treated at the same facility, whereas 13.7% were transferred. Transferred patients tended to be younger, male, and more severely injured than non transferred patients. Moreover, they were admitted to ICU more often, had a higher mortality rate but were less operated on compared to non transferred patients. The 34.3% of transfers was from facilities with none of the five requirements, whereas the 12.4% was from those with one requirement. Low level facilities, with up to three requirements transferred 43.2% of their transfer volume to units of equal resources. CONCLUSION: Trauma management in Greece results in a high number of transfers. Patients are frequently transferred between low level facilities. Better coordination could lead to improved outcomes and less cost.
背景:任何创伤系统的质量评估都涉及到转移模式的评估。本研究旨在评估在没有正式创伤系统设置的情况下的医院间转院,并估计实施更有组织的结构所带来的益处。
方法:“希腊创伤的流行病学和管理报告”是一项为期一年的全国创伤患者报告项目。它提供了有关医院间转院模式的数据。我们将转院患者组与非转院患者组进行了比较。审查的信息包括患者和损伤特征、手术需求、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和死亡率。分析采用描述性统计和卡方检验。然后根据每个医疗机构是否具备以下 5 项要求(计算机断层扫描扫描仪、ICU、神经外科医生、骨科和血管外科医生)评估医院间转院情况。
结果:对 8524 名患者的数据进行了分析;86.3%的患者在同一医疗机构接受治疗,而 13.7%的患者被转院。与非转院患者相比,转院患者年龄更小、男性更多、受伤更严重。此外,他们更经常被收入 ICU,死亡率更高,但接受手术的比例低于非转院患者。34.3%的转院是从没有这 5 项要求的医疗机构进行的,而 12.4%的转院是从只有 1 项要求的医疗机构进行的。低级别医疗机构,即只有 3 项要求的医疗机构,将其转院量的 43.2%转至同等资源的单位。
结论:希腊的创伤管理导致了大量的转院。患者经常在低级别医疗机构之间转院。更好的协调可以改善结果并降低成本。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010-3-16
J Trauma. 2005-9
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020-3-17
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2011-6-16
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010-3-16
J Am Coll Surg. 2008-1
J Trauma. 2007-7