• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酸蚀冲洗粘结剂、自酸蚀粘结剂及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀在非龋性颈部病变中的长期牙本质粘结性能

Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.

作者信息

van Dijken Jan W V, Pallesen Ulla

机构信息

Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):915-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008
PMID:18155288
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term retention to dentin of seven adhesive systems.

METHODS

A total of 270 Class V restorations of four etch-and-rinse, one self-etch adhesive system and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement were placed in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional enamel involvement. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then every year during a 13-year follow-up. Dentin bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations.

RESULTS

During the 13 years, 215 restorations could be evaluated. The cumulative loss rate at 13 years was 53.0%, with significant different failures rates for the different systems varying between 35.6 and 86.8%. Four systems fulfilled the ADA 18-month full acceptance retention criteria. Two systems showed at 18 months and earlier high debonding rates. The annual failure rates for the etch-and-rinse systems were Optibond 3.1%, Permagen 13.0%, Scotchbond MP 4.8%, Syntac classic 2.8%; for the self-etch system P&S 4.4%; and the resin-modified glass ionomer cement Vitremer 2.7%.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that all systems showed a continuous degradation of the bond with a wide variation, which was independent of the adhesion strategy. Three bonding systems showed a cumulative failure rate after 13 years between 36 and 41% with the best retention for the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a four-step etch-and-rinse system.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估七种粘结系统对牙本质的临床长期粘结保留情况。

方法

在无龋性颈部病变且未故意累及釉质的情况下,放置了总共270个Ⅴ类修复体,其中包括四种酸蚀冲洗粘结系统、一种自酸蚀粘结系统和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀。在基线、6个月、12个月、18个月和24个月时对修复体进行评估,然后在13年的随访期间每年评估一次。通过修复体脱落的百分比来确定牙本质粘结效率。

结果

在13年期间,可对215个修复体进行评估。13年时的累积脱落率为53.0%,不同系统的失败率差异显著,在35.6%至86.8%之间。四种系统符合ADA 18个月完全接受保留标准。两种系统在18个月及更早时显示出高脱粘率。酸蚀冲洗系统的年失败率分别为:Optibond 3.1%、Permagen 13.0%、Scotchbond MP 4.8%、Syntac classic 2.8%;自酸蚀系统P&S为4.4%;树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀Vitremer为2.7%。

结论

可以得出结论,所有系统的粘结都呈现出持续降解,且差异很大,这与粘结策略无关。三种粘结系统在13年后的累积失败率在36%至41%之间,树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和四步酸蚀冲洗系统的保留情况最佳。

相似文献

1
Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.酸蚀冲洗粘结剂、自酸蚀粘结剂及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀在非龋性颈部病变中的长期牙本质粘结性能
Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):915-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
2
Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.酸蚀冲洗和自酸蚀粘结系统在非龋性颈部病变中的临床长期保留情况:一项13年的评估
Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
3
A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.一项不含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)的一体化粘结剂用于非龋性颈部病变的1年随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2008 Oct;36(10):847-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
4
Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.树脂改性玻璃离子黏结剂在非龋性颈部病变中的保留情况:6年随访
J Dent. 2005 Aug;33(7):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.015. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
5
Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.四种聚酸改性树脂复合材料和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀用于Ⅴ类洞修复的两年临床评估
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.
6
An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.非龋性颈部病变中自酸蚀和酸蚀冲洗粘结剂的18个月评估。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Jun;63(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350510019874.
7
5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.树脂复合材料与树脂改性玻璃离子修复系统用于非龋性颈部病变的5年临床性能
Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):403-8. doi: 10.2341/05-87.
8
One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.树脂改性玻璃离子体和树脂复合体修复材料用于未预备的V类洞修复的一年期临床性能
Oper Dent. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):112-6.
9
Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.树脂改性玻璃离子体和复合树脂修复体的边缘微渗漏:使用酸蚀冲洗粘结剂和自酸蚀粘结剂的效果
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.102234.
10
A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.非龋性V类洞病变中树脂复合体与复合体的临床评估。3年随访。
Am J Dent. 2008 Feb;21(1):49-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive in Class I and Class II restorations at 1 year.一项前瞻性随机临床试验,评估一种新型通用粘结剂在Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复体中1年的临床性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06121-3.
2
A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam.关于影响直接修复材料替代汞合金粘结强度因素的批判性综述。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;17(19):4853. doi: 10.3390/ma17194853.
3
Restoration-repair potential of resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀的修复潜力。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Jul 23;38:e076. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0076. eCollection 2024.
4
Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions.基于树脂的复合材料与树脂改性玻璃离子体治疗颈部龋损的长期临床比较
Odontology. 2025 Jan;113(1):404-415. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00958-6. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.生物活性材料在永久性牙齿修复中的保留率是否高于非生物活性材料?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 28;28(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05414-3.
6
Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of RMGIC/GIC Class V Restorations.树脂改性玻璃离子粘固剂/玻璃离子粘固剂V类洞修复体的回顾性临床评价
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 20;11(9):225. doi: 10.3390/dj11090225.
7
Fourteen-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.一种无 HEMA 的一步自酸蚀黏结剂用于非龋性颈病的十四年临床效果。
J Adhes Dent. 2023 Jul 12;25:147-158. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4208859.
8
Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions-Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?非龋性颈壁缺损中复合树脂修复-哪种窝洞预备更具临床可靠性?
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Oct;6(5):558-567. doi: 10.1002/cre2.310. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
9
Biomodification of a Class-V Restorative Material by Incorporation of Bioactive Agents.通过添加生物活性剂对V类修复材料进行生物改性。
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Nov 29;7(4):110. doi: 10.3390/dj7040110.
10
A 2-year clinical evaluation of direct and semi-direct resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomized clinical study.非龋性颈缘缺损中直接和间接树脂复合材料修复体的 2 年临床评价:一项随机临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1321-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03011-x. Epub 2019 Jul 11.