Inkster Melanie E, Fahey Tom P, Donnan Peter T, Leese Graham P, Mires Gary J, Murphy Deirdre J
Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, MacKenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, UK, DD2 4BF.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Oct 30;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-30.
Glycaemic control in women with diabetes is critical to satisfactory pregnancy outcome. A systematic review of two randomised trials concluded that there was no clear evidence of benefit from very tight versus tight glycaemic control for pregnant women with diabetes.
A systematic review of observational studies addressing miscarriage, congenital malformations and perinatal mortality among pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes was carried out. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Observational studies with data on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels categorised into poor and optimal control (as defined by the study investigators) were selected. Relative risks and odds ratios were calculated for HbA1c and pregnancy outcomes. Adjusted relative risk estimates per 1-percent decrease in HbA1c were calculated for studies which contained information on mean and standard deviations of HbA1c.
The review identified thirteen studies which compared poor versus optimal glycaemic control in relation to maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Twelve of these studies reported the outcome of congenital malformations and showed an increased risk with poor glycaemic control, pooled odds ratio 3.44 (95%CI, 2.30 to 5.15). For four of the twelve studies, it was also possible to calculate a relative risk reduction of congenital malformation for each 1-percent decrease in HbA1c, these varied from 0.39 to 0.59. The risk of miscarriage was reported in four studies and was associated with poor glycaemic control, pooled odds ratio 3.23 (95%CI, 1.64 to 6.36). Increased perinatal mortality was also associated with poor glycaemic control, pooled odds ratio 3.03 (95%CI, 1.87 to 4.92) from four studies.
This analysis quantifies the increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes who have poor glycaemic control. Relating percentage risk reduction in HbA1c to relative risk of adverse pregnancy events may be useful in motivating women to achieve optimal control prior to conception.
糖尿病女性的血糖控制对于获得满意的妊娠结局至关重要。一项对两项随机试验的系统评价得出结论,对于糖尿病孕妇,与严格血糖控制相比,超严格血糖控制并无明显益处。
对关于1型和2型糖尿病孕妇流产、先天性畸形和围产期死亡率的观察性研究进行系统评价。在医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和考克兰图书馆进行文献检索。选择糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平数据分为控制不佳和控制最佳(由研究调查人员定义)的观察性研究。计算HbA1c与妊娠结局的相对风险和比值比。对于包含HbA1c均值和标准差信息的研究,计算每降低1%的HbA1c调整后的相对风险估计值。
该评价确定了13项比较血糖控制不佳与最佳血糖控制对孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿结局影响的研究。其中12项研究报告了先天性畸形的结局,结果显示血糖控制不佳会增加风险,合并比值比为3.44(95%置信区间,2.30至5.15)。在这12项研究中的4项研究中,还能够计算出每降低1%的HbA1c先天性畸形相对风险降低值,范围从0.39至0.59。4项研究报告了流产风险,且与血糖控制不佳有关,合并比值比为3.23(95%置信区间,1.64至6.36)。围产期死亡率增加也与血糖控制不佳有关,4项研究的合并比值比为3.03(95%置信区间,1.8