Denker H-W
Institut fuer Anatomie, Lehrstuhl fuer Anatomie und Entwicklungsbiologie, Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov;32(11):665-71. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014738.
The recent discussions about alternative sources of human embryonic stem cells (White Paper of the US President's Council on Bioethics, 2005), while stirring new interest in the developmental potential of the various abnormal embryos or constructs proposed as such sources, also raise questions about the potential of the derived embryonic stem cells. The data on the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells that seem relevant for ethical considerations and aspects of patentability are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the meaning of "totipotency, omnipotency and pluripotency" as illustrated by a comparison of the developmental potential of three-dimensional clusters of blastomeres (morula), embryonic stem cells, somatic or (adult) stem cells or other somatic (non-stem) cells. This paper focuses on embryoid bodies and on direct cloning by tetraploid complementation. Usage and patenting of these cells cannot be considered to be ethically sound as long as totipotency and tetraploid complementability of embryonic stem cells are not excluded for the specific cell line in question. Testing this poses an ethical problem in itself and needs to be discussed in the future.
近期关于人类胚胎干细胞替代来源的讨论(美国总统生物伦理委员会白皮书,2005年),在引发人们对各种被提议作为此类来源的异常胚胎或构建体的发育潜能产生新兴趣的同时,也引发了关于由此获得的胚胎干细胞潜能的问题。本文讨论了与伦理考量及可专利性方面相关的胚胎干细胞发育潜能的数据。通过比较卵裂球(桑椹胚)的三维聚集体、胚胎干细胞、体细胞或(成体)干细胞或其他体细胞(非干细胞)的发育潜能,特别关注了“全能性、多能性和多潜能性”的含义。本文重点关注类胚体和四倍体互补直接克隆。只要所讨论的特定细胞系未排除胚胎干细胞的全能性和四倍体互补性,这些细胞的使用和专利申请在伦理上就不能被视为合理。对此进行测试本身就存在伦理问题,需要在未来进行讨论。