• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盐酸左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液在日本季节性过敏性结膜炎患者结膜过敏原激发试验中的疗效。

Efficacy of levocabastine hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge test in Japanese subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

作者信息

Takamura Etsuko, Nomura Keiko, Fujishima Hiroshi, Fukagawa Kazumi, Satake Yoshiyuki, Fukada Yuka, Sawa Mitsuru, Uchida Eiji

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Allergol Int. 2006 Jun;55(2):157-65. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.157.

DOI:10.2332/allergolint.55.157
PMID:17075252
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.025% levocabastine hydrochloride in Japanese subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and its duration of action using the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) test.

METHODS

Twenty-four asymptomatic subjects were randomized to instill 0.025% levocabastine ophthalmic suspension in one eye and vehicle in the other eye 10 minutes before the CAC test. Signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis were scored 10, 15, and 25 minutes after the CAC test. The duration of drug effects was also evaluated by allergen rechallenge 4 hours after levocabastine administration. The itching score for each eye as the primary efficacy endpoint was assessed 15 minutes after the CAC test using a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

The mean itching score in the levocabastine-treated group was 0.08 +/- 0.06, which was significantly lower than the mean score of 1.98 +/- 0.16 in the vehicle group (P < 0.0001). The redness and chemosis of the conjunctiva were also improved significantly compared with the vehicle group. Levocabastine showed prolonged efficacy in inhibiting itching (0.42 +/- 0.12 vs 0.94 +/- 0.17, P < 0.0002) and redness (1.04 +/- 0.18 vs 1.42 +/- 0.22, P < 0.01) of the conjunctiva upon the rechallenge test. No significant topical or systemic adverse safety findings were observed in the levocabastine group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that 0.025% levocabastine ophthalmic suspension is effective and safe in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis with a duration of action of at least 4 h.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过结膜过敏原激发试验(CAC),调查0.025%盐酸左卡巴斯汀对日本季节性过敏性结膜炎患者的疗效、安全性及其作用持续时间。

方法

24名无症状受试者被随机分为两组,在CAC试验前10分钟,一只眼睛滴入0.025%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液,另一只眼睛滴入赋形剂。在CAC试验后10、15和25分钟对过敏性结膜炎的体征和症状进行评分。在给予左卡巴斯汀4小时后,通过再次激发过敏原评估药物作用持续时间。以每只眼睛的瘙痒评分为主要疗效终点,在CAC试验后15分钟使用5分制进行评估。

结果

左卡巴斯汀治疗组的平均瘙痒评分为0.08±0.06,显著低于赋形剂组的平均评分1.98±0.16(P<0.0001)。与赋形剂组相比,结膜的充血和水肿也有显著改善。在再次激发试验中,左卡巴斯汀在抑制结膜瘙痒(0.42±0.12对0.94±0.17,P<0.0002)和充血(1.04±0.18对1.42±0.22,P<0.01)方面显示出延长的疗效。在左卡巴斯汀组中未观察到明显的局部或全身不良安全性发现。

结论

结果表明,0.025%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液治疗过敏性结膜炎有效且安全,作用持续时间至少为4小时。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of levocabastine hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge test in Japanese subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.盐酸左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液在日本季节性过敏性结膜炎患者结膜过敏原激发试验中的疗效。
Allergol Int. 2006 Jun;55(2):157-65. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.157.
2
Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.使用结膜过敏原激发模型比较0.1%奥洛他定滴眼液与0.05%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液的疗效
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Dec;20(12):1953-8. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5724.
3
Emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% versus levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.使用结膜过敏原激发模型,比较0.05%依美斯汀眼药水与0.05%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液治疗过敏性结膜炎的效果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;130(6):717-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00689-9.
4
Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.苯海拉明倍他司汀贝他斯汀滴眼液 1.0%和 1.5%在过敏性结膜炎中的起效时间和作用持续时间:一项成人和儿童的 III 期、单中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、结膜变应原挑战评估的研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1908-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.001.
5
Evaluation of the new ophthalmic antihistamine, 0.05% levocabastine, in the clinical allergen challenge model of allergic conjunctivitis.在过敏性结膜炎临床变应原激发模型中对新型眼科抗组胺药0.05%左卡巴斯汀的评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994 Sep;94(3 Pt 1):458-64. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(94)90201-1.
6
[Safety and efficacy of a new preservative-free levocabastine ophthalmic solution (Levofree®) using the conjunctival provocation test].[使用结膜激发试验评估新型无防腐剂左卡巴斯汀滴眼液(Levofree®)的安全性和有效性]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Sep;35(7):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.08.016. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
7
Prolonged effectiveness of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.贝他斯汀倍他司汀滴眼液治疗过敏性结膜炎眼部症状的长期疗效。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;27(4):385-93. doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0005. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
8
Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.盐酸氮卓斯汀滴眼液经结膜注射雪松花粉过敏原激发试验对过敏性结膜炎的疗效
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Oct;113(4):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Comparison of azelastine eye drops with levocabastine eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.氮卓斯汀滴眼液与左卡巴斯汀滴眼液治疗季节性过敏性结膜炎的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2000;16(3):153-63.
10
Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.在结膜过敏原激发模型中比较富马酸酮替芬滴眼液单药、地氯雷他定单药及其联合用药对季节性变应性鼻结膜炎体征和症状的抑制作用:一项双盲、安慰剂对照和阳性对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2003 Jul;25(7):1975-87. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80199-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized controlled trials define shape of dose response for Pollinex Quattro Birch allergoid immunotherapy.随机对照试验定义了柏灵过敏原免疫治疗(Pollinex Quattro Birch allergoid immunotherapy)的剂量反应形状。
Allergy. 2018 Sep;73(9):1812-1822. doi: 10.1111/all.13478. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Semaphorin 3A controls allergic and inflammatory responses in experimental allergic conjunctivitis.信号素3A调控实验性变应性结膜炎中的过敏和炎症反应。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 18;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.01.01. eCollection 2015.
3
Efficacy of olopatadine versus epinastine for treating allergic conjunctivitis caused by Japanese cedar pollen: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
奥洛他定与依匹斯汀治疗日本雪松花粉引起的过敏性结膜炎的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Adv Ther. 2014 Oct;31(10):1045-58. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0156-2. Epub 2014 Oct 1.