Constantinides Vasilis A, Tekkis Paris P, Fazil Azeem, Kaur Kelly, Leonard Richard, Platt Mike, Casula Roberto, Stanbridge Rex, Darzi Ara, Athanasiou Thanos
Imperial College London, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):2875-82. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000248724.02907.1B.
Risk factors for unsuccessful fast-tracking of cardiac surgery patients have not been collectively defined in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for fast-track failure and incorporate them into a predictive fast-track failure score.
Prospective observational study.
Cardiothoracic Department of St Mary's Hospital, London.
Data were collected from April 2003 to April 2005 including 1,084 patients undergoing heart surgery who were admitted into the fast-track unit.
Multifactorial logistic regression was used to develop a propensity score for estimating the likelihood of fast-track failure.
One hundred and sixty-nine patients failed fast-track management (15.6%). Independent predictors for fast-track failure were impaired left ventricular function with or without recent acute coronary syndrome (odds ratios 2.89 and 1.65 respectively), re-do operation (one, two, or more vs. none, odds ratio 1.75, 7.98), extracardiac arteriopathy (odds ratio 2.63), preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (odds ratio 3.09), raised serum creatinine in micromol/L (120-150, >150 vs. <120, odds ratio 1.57, 11.24), and nonelective (odds ratio 3.43) and complex surgery (odds ratio 2.70). Model validation showed very good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.815) and calibration (ĉ statistic = 8.527, p = .129).
The fast-track failure score incorporates several preoperative factors and has been successfully internally validated; after undergoing external validation and possible recalibration it may be used as a tool to facilitate planning and flow of cardiac surgery patients, based on the predicted probability of failure. Application of this score may limit fast-track failure rates and help to reduce morbidity and cost.
心脏手术患者快速康复未成功的危险因素在文献中尚未得到统一界定。本研究旨在确定快速康复失败的危险因素,并将其纳入预测快速康复失败的评分系统。
前瞻性观察研究。
伦敦圣玛丽医院心胸外科。
收集了2003年4月至2005年4月期间的数据,包括1084例接受心脏手术并入住快速康复病房的患者。
采用多因素逻辑回归分析建立倾向评分,以估计快速康复失败的可能性。
169例患者快速康复管理失败(15.6%)。快速康复失败的独立预测因素包括有或无近期急性冠状动脉综合征的左心室功能受损(比值比分别为2.89和1.65)、再次手术(一次、两次或更多次与未进行再次手术相比,比值比为1.75、7.98)、心外动脉病变(比值比为2.63)、术前主动脉内球囊反搏(比值比为3.09)、血清肌酐升高(以微摩尔/升计,120 - 150、> > 150与< < 120相比,比值比为1.57、11.24),以及非择期手术(比值比为3.43)和复杂手术(比值比为2.70)。模型验证显示具有良好的区分度(曲线下面积 = 0.815)和校准度(ĉ统计量 = 8.527,p = 0.129)。
快速康复失败评分纳入了多个术前因素,并已成功进行内部验证;经过外部验证和可能的重新校准后,它可作为一种工具,根据预测的失败概率,促进心脏手术患者的规划和流程安排。应用该评分可能会降低快速康复失败率,并有助于降低发病率和成本。