Campillo Bernard, Richardet Jean-Philippe, Bories Phuong-Nhi
Service de Rééducation Digestive, Hôpital Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2006 Oct;30(10):1137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73491-1.
Simple clinical tools are needed to detect malnutrition in cirrhotic patients. We have validated optimal body mass index (BMI) cut-offs for the diagnosis of malnutrition in accordance with the importance of ascites.
BMI, mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) and triceps skinfold thickness (TST) were measured before paracentesis in study (SP) and validation (VP) populations of 875 and 294 cirrhotic patients, respectively with no ascite (NA), mild (MA), tense ascites (TA) (NA/MA/TA: SP: 327, 270, 278; VP: 111, 69, 114). Preserved nutritional status (SP: 259; VP: 93), malnutrition including severe and moderate malnutrition (SP: 251 and 365; VP: 92 and 109) were defined from MAMC and TST measurements.
Optimal BMI cut-off values were 22, 23 and 25 kg/m2 in NA, MA and TA patients, respectively. In the whole SP and VP, sensitivities of these cut-offs were 86.2% and 89.1%, respectively; the corresponding negative predictive values (NPV) for the diagnosis of severe malnutrition were 92.3% and 93.2%; specificities and positive predictive values (PPV) were 87.7% and 89.9%, 92.7% and 93.6%, respectively for the diagnosis of malnutrition. In the entire VP, peripheral oedema did not change sensitivity and NPV of BMI cut-offs for the diagnosis of severe malnutrition and tended to increase specificity and PPV for the diagnosis of malnutrition. 96.7% of the malnourished TA patients in the VP before paracentesis were correctly identified after removal of ascites.
BMI is a reliable parameter to detect malnutrition in cirrhotic patients with the above mentioned cut-offs. Peripheral oedema and removal of ascites do not affect its diagnostic performance.
需要简单的临床工具来检测肝硬化患者的营养不良情况。我们根据腹水的严重程度,验证了用于诊断营养不良的最佳体重指数(BMI)临界值。
分别在875例研究(SP)人群和294例验证(VP)人群的肝硬化患者中,于腹腔穿刺术前测量BMI、上臂中部肌肉周长(MAMC)和肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TST),这些患者分别有无腹水(NA)、轻度腹水(MA)、大量腹水(TA)(NA/MA/TA:SP:327、270、278;VP:111、69、114)。根据MAMC和TST测量结果定义营养状况良好(SP:259;VP:93)、包括重度和中度营养不良在内的营养不良(SP:251和365;VP:92和109)。
NA、MA和TA患者的最佳BMI临界值分别为22、23和25kg/m²。在整个SP和VP人群中,这些临界值的敏感性分别为86.2%和89.1%;诊断重度营养不良的相应阴性预测值(NPV)分别为92.3%和93.2%;诊断营养不良的特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为87.7%和89.9%、92.7%和93.6%。在整个VP人群中,外周水肿并未改变BMI临界值对重度营养不良诊断的敏感性和NPV,且倾向于增加对营养不良诊断的特异性和PPV。VP人群中96.7%的穿刺术前大量腹水的营养不良患者在放腹水后被正确识别。
上述临界值的BMI是检测肝硬化患者营养不良的可靠参数。外周水肿和放腹水不影响其诊断性能。