Suppr超能文献

摩根塔勒诉加拿大最高法院的女王案。

Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.

作者信息

Martin S L

出版信息

Can J Women Law. 1987;2(2):422-31.

Abstract

In Morgentaler v. R., the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the abortion provisions in the Criminal Code. In a five to two split, a majority of the Supreme Court judges found that section 251 offended a pregnant woman's constitutionally protected right not to be deprived of her "life, liberty, and security of the person." Sheilah Martin reviews the three majority judgments and focuses on the decision written by Madame Justice Wilson. She believes that Madame Justice Wilson's opinion merits special attention in several regards: her conclusions on the constitutional rights of pregnant women; her recognition and validation of women's perspectives on abortion; and her approach to balancing women's interests in reproductive self-determination against the state's interest in regulating reproduction. Sheilah Martin concludes that this decision will reverberate far into the future. Even though it fails to establish clear guidelines concerning governmental power to control access to abortion, its principles outline the legal framework in which future litigation will occur, and it will limit and shape the terms of any ensuing political debate. In addition, Madame Justice Wilson's judgment holds great promise for those looking to the Court to promote the rights of women and other historically disadvantaged groups.

摘要

在“摩根塔勒诉女王案”中,加拿大最高法院推翻了《刑法典》中的堕胎条款。最高法院法官以5比2的票数分歧,多数法官认定第251条侵犯了孕妇受宪法保护的不被剥夺“生命、自由和人身安全”的权利。希拉·马丁审视了三份多数派判决,并着重关注了威尔逊大法官撰写的判决。她认为,威尔逊大法官的意见在几个方面值得特别关注:她对孕妇宪法权利的结论;她对女性堕胎观点的认可与确认;以及她在平衡女性生殖自主利益与国家规范生育利益方面的方法。希拉·马丁得出结论,这一判决将在未来产生深远影响。尽管它未能确立有关政府控制堕胎准入权力的明确指导方针,但其原则勾勒出了未来诉讼将在其中展开的法律框架,并且它将限制并塑造任何后续政治辩论的条件。此外,对于那些期待法院推动女性及其他历史上处于弱势地位群体权利的人而言,威尔逊大法官的判决前景广阔。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验