球囊后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗椎体压缩性骨折:疗效与安全性的比较系统评价
Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety.
作者信息
Taylor Rod S, Taylor Rebecca J, Fritzell Peter
机构信息
Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2747-55. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244639.71656.7d.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-regression.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, and to examine the prognostic factors that predict outcome.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
A previous systematic review of vertebroplasty by Levine et al in 2000 identified seven case series studies and no controlled studies.
METHODS
A number of electronic databases were searched through March 1, 2004. Citation searches of included studies were undertaken and contact was made with experts in the field. No language restrictions were applied. All controlled and uncontrolled studies were included with the exception of case reports. Prognostic factors responsible for pain relief and cement leakage were examined using meta-regression.
RESULTS
The following studies were included: balloon kyphoplasty (three nonrandomized comparative studies against conventional medical therapy and 13 case series), vertebroplasty (one nonrandomized comparative study against conventional medical care and 57 cases series), balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty (one nonrandomized comparative study). The majority of studies were undertaken in older women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with long-term pain that was refractory to medical treatment. At this time, there is no good quality direct comparative evidence of balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty. From indirect comparison of case series evidence, the procedures appear to provide similar gains in pain relief while for balloon kyphoplasty there is better documentation of gains in patient functionality and quality of life. The level of cement leakage and number of reported adverse events (pulmonary emboli and neurologic injury) in balloon kyphoplasty was significantly lower than for vertebroplasty. These findings were confirmed by meta-regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
There is Level III evidence to support balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty as effective therapies in the management of patients with symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures refractory to conventional medical therapy. Although there was a good ratio of benefit to harm for both procedures, balloon kyphoplasty appears to offer the better adverse event profile. These conclusions need to be updated on the basis of the findings of ongoing randomized controlled trials.
研究设计
系统评价与meta回归分析。
目的
比较球囊后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗椎体压缩骨折的疗效和安全性,并探讨预测预后的因素。
背景资料总结
2000年Levine等人对椎体成形术进行的一项系统评价纳入了7项病例系列研究,未纳入对照研究。
方法
检索多个电子数据库至2004年3月1日。对纳入研究进行引文检索,并与该领域专家进行联系。未设语言限制。除病例报告外,所有对照和非对照研究均纳入。使用meta回归分析探讨导致疼痛缓解和骨水泥渗漏的预后因素。
结果
纳入以下研究:球囊后凸成形术(3项与传统药物治疗对比的非随机对照研究和13项病例系列)、椎体成形术(1项与传统医疗护理对比的非随机对照研究和57项病例系列)、球囊后凸成形术与椎体成形术对比(1项非随机对照研究)。大多数研究针对患有骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折且长期疼痛、药物治疗无效的老年女性。目前,尚无关于球囊后凸成形术与椎体成形术的高质量直接对比证据。从病例系列证据的间接对比来看,两种手术在缓解疼痛方面似乎效果相似,而球囊后凸成形术在改善患者功能和生活质量方面有更充分的记录。球囊后凸成形术的骨水泥渗漏水平和报告的不良事件(肺栓塞和神经损伤)数量显著低于椎体成形术。这些发现通过meta回归分析得到证实。
结论
有Ⅲ级证据支持球囊后凸成形术和椎体成形术作为治疗对传统药物治疗无效的有症状骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的有效疗法。虽然两种手术的利弊比都较好,但球囊后凸成形术似乎不良事件更少。这些结论需要根据正在进行的随机对照试验结果进行更新。