Marino Victoria, Mungalpara Nirav, Amirouche Farid
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Institute of Orthopaedics and Spine, Northshore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2025 May;34(5):1641-1662. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08707-1. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common among the elderly, causing significant morbidity, pain, and disability. This study quantitatively analyzes the vertebral height restoration via Kyphoplasty (KP) and Vertebroplasty (VP), along with the cement volume used and leakage percentage. Our meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compares these objective outcomes, considering cement volume and leakage in both procedures.
Databases searched included Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science using MeSH keywords: 'Kyphoplasty,' 'Vertebroplasty,' 'Vertebral height restoration,' 'Bone cement volume,' and 'Vertebral compression fractures.' Fourteen RCTs were selected, focusing on outcomes such as anterior and central vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, cement volume, and leakage. Data analysis included mean values, standard deviations, ranges, Cohen's d-effect sizes, and standard errors, summarized in a forest plotQuery.
The review included 1456 patients (mean age 71.11 years). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 48 months (mean 15 months). KP showed a greater effect size in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and kyphotic angle. Combined data from KP and VP showed increases of 3.48 mm (19.14%) in anterior vertebral heights, 4.38 mm in central vertebral heights, and a 2.85-degree correction in kyphotic angle.
Both KP and VP effectively restore vertebral height in VCF patients. KP is superior in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and correcting kyphotic angle. VP, particularly unilateral, shows higher central vertebral height restoration but higher cement leakage. Standardized reporting and patient-specific volumetric assessments are crucial for optimizing vertebral augmentation procedures.
椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)在老年人中很常见,会导致严重的发病率、疼痛和残疾。本研究定量分析了经皮椎体后凸成形术(KP)和经皮椎体成形术(VP)对椎体高度的恢复情况,以及所用骨水泥的体积和渗漏率。我们对14项随机对照试验(RCT)进行的荟萃分析比较了这些客观结果,同时考虑了两种手术中的骨水泥体积和渗漏情况。
使用医学主题词(MeSH)关键词“椎体后凸成形术”“经皮椎体成形术”“椎体高度恢复”“骨水泥体积”和“椎体压缩性骨折”检索了包括Medline、PubMed和科学网在内的数据库。选择了14项RCT,重点关注椎体前缘和中央高度、后凸角、骨水泥体积和渗漏等结果。数据分析包括平均值、标准差、范围、科恩d效应量和标准误差,汇总在森林图查询中。
该综述纳入了1456例患者(平均年龄71.11岁)。随访时间为1至48个月(平均15个月)。KP在恢复椎体前缘和中央高度以及后凸角方面显示出更大的效应量。KP和VP的综合数据显示,椎体前缘高度增加了3.48毫米(19.14%),中央椎体高度增加了4.38毫米,后凸角矫正了2.85度。
KP和VP都能有效恢复VCF患者的椎体高度。KP在恢复椎体前缘和中央高度以及矫正后凸角方面更具优势。VP,尤其是单侧VP,显示出更高的中央椎体高度恢复,但骨水泥渗漏率更高。标准化报告和针对患者的体积评估对于优化椎体强化手术至关重要。