• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神损伤赔偿:神经休克法的演变

Compensation for psychiatric injury: evolution of a law of nervous shock.

作者信息

Griffith Richard

机构信息

School of Health Science, Swansea University.

出版信息

Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Sep;11(9):396-401. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.9.21763.

DOI:10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.9.21763
PMID:17077763
Abstract

District nurses will be well aware that if a person receives an injury because of someone else's negligence they are entitled to compensation for the harm that has been caused. However, where the injury is in the form of psychiatric harm the law has traditionally imposed rules that set out the conditions to be met before a successful claim for damages can be made. Even in today's enlightened society the law still does not always treat a psychiatric injury in the same way as a physical injury. In this article Richard Griffith outlines the development of the law in relation to psychiatric injury--historically called "nervous shock"--and considers the current approach to claims for damages where a person suffers psychiatric harm because of another's negligent act.

摘要

地区护士很清楚,如果一个人因他人的疏忽而受伤,那么他有权就所遭受的伤害获得赔偿。然而,当伤害表现为精神损害时,法律传统上规定了一些规则,阐明了成功索赔损害赔偿之前必须满足的条件。即使在当今开明的社会,法律对精神伤害的处理方式仍不总是与身体伤害相同。在本文中,理查德·格里菲斯概述了与精神伤害(历史上称为“精神休克”)相关的法律发展,并探讨了在一个人因他人的疏忽行为而遭受精神伤害时,目前对损害赔偿索赔的处理方式。

相似文献

1
Compensation for psychiatric injury: evolution of a law of nervous shock.精神损伤赔偿:神经休克法的演变
Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Sep;11(9):396-401. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.9.21763.
2
Psychiatric Illness and Clinical Negligence: When Can "Secondary Victims" Successfully Claim for Damages? Recent Developments from the United Kingdom.精神疾病与临床疏忽:“二次受害人”何时可成功索偿?来自英国的最新发展
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Jun;21(2):217-224. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10346-y. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Negligence, trauma and nervous shock.过失、创伤与精神休克。
Br J Nurs. 2020 Jun 11;29(11):642-643. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.11.642.
4
PTSD and the law of psychiatric injury in England and Wales: finally coming closer?创伤后应激障碍与英格兰和威尔士的精神损伤法:终于要更接近了吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(3):327-32.
5
Victim or accomplice? Crime, medical malpractice, and the construction of the aborting woman in American case law, 1860s-1970.受害者还是同谋?犯罪、医疗事故以及美国判例法中堕胎女性的形象塑造,19世纪60年代至1970年
Columbia J Gend Law. 2001;10(2):311-32.
6
Criminal injuries compensation: Protecting vulnerable applicants.刑事伤害赔偿:保护弱势申请人。
J Law Med. 2015 Sep;23(1):189-203.
7
Compensation for non-negligent harm in trials remains shaky.在审判中,对非过失伤害的赔偿仍不稳定。
BMJ. 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):489-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7539.489-b.
8
Claiming for nervous shock due to negligence in the workplace.因工作场所疏忽导致精神创伤而提出索赔。
Med Leg J. 2004;72(Pt 1):31-3. doi: 10.1258/rsmmlj.72.1.31.
9
Reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS.改革国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中临床过失的处理方式。
Br J Nurs. 2017 Apr 27;26(8):474-475. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.8.474.
10
The theory of loss of chance in medical liability applied within Brazilian jurisprudence.医疗责任中的机会丧失理论在巴西法学中的应用。
Med Law. 2012 Jun;31(2):265-81.