Raedt Robrecht, Pinxteren Jef, Van Dycke Annelies, Waeytens Anouk, Craeye David, Timmermans Frank, Vonck Kristl, Vandekerckhove Bart, Plum Jean, Boon Paul
Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
Exp Neurol. 2007 Feb;203(2):542-54. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
There are accumulating studies that report a neurogenic potential of bone marrow-derived cells both in vitro as well as in vivo. Most claims of neural "transdifferentiation" have based their conclusions on morphology and neural gene expression. Recently, doubts have been raised about the validity of both outcome parameters since non-neural cells can extend neurites and show aberrant neural gene expression as a response to stress inducing factors. In this study, we compared bone marrow-derived Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cell (MAPC)-like cells and neural stem cells (NSC) in their morphology and neural gene expression profile after neural differentiation using three differentiation protocols. We evaluated the expression of five neuroglial antigens [neurofilament 200 (NF200); beta III tubulin (beta3 tub); tau; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP); Myelin Basic Protein (MBP) and RIP antigen] using real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). MAPC-like cells adopted a neural-like morphology in one protocol but a fibroblast-like morphology in the two other protocols. RT-PCR and ICC show that MAPC-like cells already express the neural antigens beta III tubulin and NF200 at baseline, but no upregulation of these genes after exposure to three distinct differentiation protocols was seen. In contrast, NSC adopt neural and glial morphologies with a clear increase in expression of all neuroglial genes in all differentiation protocols used. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that neural-like morphology and expression of a limited set of neural marker genes by MAPC-like cells after differentiation are not absolute proof of neural transdifferentiation because MAPC-like cells only partially meet the criteria which are fulfilled by NSC after neural differentiation.
越来越多的研究报告了骨髓来源细胞在体外和体内的神经源性潜能。大多数关于神经“转分化”的说法都是基于形态学和神经基因表达得出结论的。最近,由于非神经细胞在应激诱导因子的作用下可以长出神经突并表现出异常的神经基因表达,这两个结果参数的有效性受到了质疑。在本研究中,我们使用三种分化方案,比较了骨髓来源的多能成体祖细胞(MAPC)样细胞和神经干细胞(NSC)在神经分化后的形态学和神经基因表达谱。我们使用实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和免疫细胞化学(ICC)评估了五种神经胶质抗原[神经丝200(NF200);βIII微管蛋白(β3tub);tau;胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP);髓鞘碱性蛋白(MBP)和RIP抗原]的表达。MAPC样细胞在一种方案中呈现神经样形态,但在其他两种方案中呈现成纤维细胞样形态。RT-PCR和ICC显示,MAPC样细胞在基线时已经表达神经抗原βIII微管蛋白和NF200,但在暴露于三种不同的分化方案后,这些基因没有上调。相比之下,NSC呈现神经和胶质形态,在所有使用的分化方案中,所有神经胶质基因的表达都明显增加。总之,我们的数据表明,分化后MAPC样细胞的神经样形态和有限的一组神经标记基因的表达并不是神经转分化的绝对证据,因为MAPC样细胞仅部分满足神经分化后NSC所满足的标准。