Dellacà R L, Duffy N, Pompilio P P, Aliverti A, Koulouris N G, Pedotti A, Calverley P M A
Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano University, Milan, Italy.
Eur Respir J. 2007 Feb;29(2):363-74. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00038006. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
The within-breath change in reactance (Delta(rs)) measured by forced oscillation technique (FOT) at 5 Hz reliably detects expiratory flow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study compared this approach to the standard negative expiratory pressure (NEP) method. In total, 21 COPD patients were studied by applying both techniques to the same breath and in 15 patients the measurements were repeated after bronchodilator. For each patient and condition five NEP tests were performed and independently scored by three operators unaware of the FOT results. In 180 tests, FOT classified 53.3% as flow limited. On average, the operators scored 27.6% of tests flow limited and 47.6% non-flow limited, but could not score 24.8%. The methods disagreed in 7.9% of cases; in 78% of these the NEP scores differed between operators. Bronchodilation reduced NEP and DeltaX(rs) scores, with only the latter achieving significance. Averaging the operators' NEP scores, a threshold between 24.6-30.8% of tidal volume being flow limited by NEP produced 94% agreement between methods. In conclusion, when negative expiratory pressure and forced oscillation technique were both available they showed good agreement. As forced oscillation technique is automatic and can measure multiple breaths over long periods, it is suitable for monitoring expiratory flow limitation continuously and identifying patients' breathing close to the onset of expiratory flow limitation, where intermittent sampling may be unrepresentative.
通过强迫振荡技术(FOT)在5Hz时测量的呼吸电抗变化(Delta(rs))能够可靠地检测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中的呼气气流受限情况。本研究将该方法与标准的呼气负压(NEP)方法进行了比较。总共对21例COPD患者进行了研究,对同一呼吸同时应用两种技术,其中15例患者在使用支气管扩张剂后重复测量。对每位患者和每种情况进行了5次NEP测试,并由3名不知道FOT结果的操作人员独立评分。在180次测试中,FOT将53.3%判定为气流受限。平均而言,操作人员将27.6%的测试判定为气流受限,47.6%判定为非气流受限,但有24.8%无法评分。两种方法在7.9%的病例中存在分歧;其中78%的病例中NEP评分在操作人员之间存在差异。支气管扩张降低了NEP和DeltaX(rs)评分,只有后者达到显著水平。将操作人员的NEP评分进行平均,当潮气量的24.6 - 30.8%被NEP判定为气流受限时,两种方法之间的一致性达到94%。总之,当呼气负压和强迫振荡技术都可用时,它们显示出良好的一致性。由于强迫振荡技术是自动的,并且可以长时间测量多次呼吸,因此它适合于连续监测呼气气流受限情况,并识别患者接近呼气气流受限开始时的呼吸情况,而间歇性采样可能不具有代表性。