Israel Jeffrey F, Campbell Donielle D, Kahn Jennifer H, Hornby T George
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Phys Ther. 2006 Nov;86(11):1466-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050266.
Robotic devices that provide passive guidance and stabilization of the legs and trunk during treadmill stepping may increase the delivery of locomotor training to subjects with neurological injury. Lower-extremity guidance also may reduce voluntary muscle activity as compared with compliant assistance provided by therapists. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in metabolic costs and lower-limb muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking.
Twelve ambulatory subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury participated.
In 2 separate protocols, metabolic and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected during standing and stepping on a treadmill with therapist and robotic assistance. During robotic-assisted walking, subjects were asked to match the kinematic trajectories of the device and maximize their effort. During therapist-assisted walking, subjects walked on the treadmill with manual assistance provided as necessary.
Metabolic costs and swing-phase hip flexor EMG activity were significantly lower when subjects were asked to match the robotic device trajectories than with therapist-assisted walking. These differences were reduced when subjects were asked to maximize their effort during robotic-assisted stepping, although swing-phase plantar-flexor EMG activity was increased. In addition, during standing prior to therapist- or robotic-assisted stepping, metabolic costs were higher without stabilization from the robotic device.
Differences in metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns between therapist- and robotic-assisted standing and stepping illustrate the importance of minimizing passive guidance and stabilization provided during step training protocols.
在跑步机行走过程中,能够为腿部和躯干提供被动引导与稳定功能的机器人设备,可能会增加对神经损伤患者的运动训练量。与治疗师提供的顺应性辅助相比,下肢引导还可能减少自主肌肉活动。本研究的目的是调查在机器人辅助和治疗师辅助的跑步机行走过程中,代谢成本和下肢肌肉活动模式的差异。
12名运动不完全性脊髓损伤的门诊受试者参与了研究。
在2个独立的方案中,分别收集了受试者在治疗师和机器人辅助下站立及在跑步机上行走时的代谢和肌电图(EMG)数据。在机器人辅助行走过程中,要求受试者匹配设备的运动轨迹并尽最大努力。在治疗师辅助行走过程中,受试者在跑步机上行走,必要时给予手动辅助。
当要求受试者匹配机器人设备轨迹时,其代谢成本和摆动期髋屈肌的肌电图活动显著低于治疗师辅助行走时。当要求受试者在机器人辅助行走过程中尽最大努力时,这些差异有所减小,尽管摆动期跖屈肌的肌电图活动增加。此外,在治疗师或机器人辅助行走前的站立过程中,没有机器人设备稳定作用时的代谢成本更高。
治疗师辅助和机器人辅助的站立及行走过程中代谢成本和肌肉活动模式的差异,说明了在步训练方案中尽量减少被动引导和稳定作用的重要性。