Cumming Anthony, Grundy Pamela, Keeney Stephen, Lester William, Enayat Said, Guilliatt Andrea, Bowen Derrick, Pasi John, Keeling David, Hill Frank, Bolton-Maggs Paula H B, Hay Charles, Collins Peter
University Department of Haematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Thromb Haemost. 2006 Nov;96(5):630-41.
Forty families diagnosed by UK centres to have type 1 VWD were recruited. Following review, six families were re-diagnosed to have type 2 VWD, one to have a platelet storage pool disorder, and one family was determined to be unaffected. Direct DNA sequencing of the promoter region and all exons and intronic boundaries of the VWF gene identified six mutations likely to be causative of VWD in index cases of nine of the 32 (28%) confirmed type 1 VWD families. These included R1205H (3614G > A) VWD Vicenza, P1648fsX45 (4944delT), D141G (422A > G) and three splice site mutations: 3108 + 5G > A, 7437 + 1G > A and 3379 + 1G > A. The Y1584C (4751A > G) polymorphism was present in eight additional families. No significant VWF gene mutation or polymorphism was identified in 15 of the 32 type 1VWD index cases (47%). Haplotype studies were performed using a panel of VWF polymorphisms to investigate the segregation in families of VWD phenotype with the VWF gene. In 13 of the 32 families it was likely that VWD segregated with the VWF gene. In eight families (25%) VWD clearly did not segregate with the VWF gene. We suggest that mutation screening of the VWF gene has limited general utility in genetic diagnostic and family studies in type 1 VWD. If genetic studies are performed, the incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of type 1 VWD must be taken into account. Unless linkage of VWD phenotype with the VWF gene can be clearly demonstrated, the results of any genetic family studies should be interpreted with caution.
招募了由英国各中心诊断为1型血管性血友病(VWD)的40个家庭。经过复查,6个家庭被重新诊断为2型VWD,1个家庭患有血小板贮存池病,还有1个家庭被确定未患病。对VWF基因的启动子区域、所有外显子及内含子边界进行直接DNA测序,在32个确诊的1型VWD家庭中的9个家庭的先证者中,发现了6个可能导致VWD的突变。这些突变包括R1205H(3614G>A)维琴察型VWD、P1648fsX45(4944delT)、D141G(422A>G)以及3个剪接位点突变:3108 + 5G>A、7437 + 1G>A和3379 + 1G>A。另外8个家庭存在Y1584C(4751A>G)多态性。32例1型VWD先证者中的15例(47%)未发现明显的VWF基因突变或多态性。利用一组VWF多态性进行单倍型研究,以调查VWD表型在家庭中与VWF基因的分离情况。在32个家庭中的13个家庭中,VWD可能与VWF基因连锁。在8个家庭(25%)中,VWD显然不与VWF基因连锁。我们认为,VWF基因的突变筛查在1型VWD的基因诊断和家系研究中的普遍实用性有限。如果进行基因研究,必须考虑1型VWD的不完全外显率和可变表达性。除非能明确证明VWD表型与VWF基因的连锁关系,否则任何基因家系研究的结果都应谨慎解释。