Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Blood Adv. 2023 Apr 25;7(8):1477-1487. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007884.
Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is associated with a reduction in qualitatively normal von Willebrand factor (VWF). Current diagnostic guidelines only take into consideration the contribution of basal VWF levels, despite a lack of correlation with bleeding severity. Defects in stimulated VWF release, which occurs after hemostatic challenge, may contribute to bleeding in type 1 VWD, but the pathogenic mechanisms are poorly defined. In this study, a layered multiomic approach including messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) sequencing was used to evaluate transcriptome-wide differences between type 1 VWD- and control-derived endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) during basal and stimulated VWF release. ECFCs from 8 patients with type 1 VWD and 4 other patients were included in this study as controls. VWF protein analysis revealed heterogenous responses to stimulation among type 1 VWD and control ECFCs. During basal VWF release, 64 mRNAs and 7 miRNAs were differentially regulated between type 1 VWD and control ECFCs, and 65 putatively pathogenic miRNA-mRNA interactions were identified. During stimulated VWF release, 190 mRNAs and 5 mRNAs were differentially regulated between type 1 VWD and control ECFCs, and 110 putatively pathogenic miRNA-mRNA interactions were identified. Five gene ontology terms including coagulation, regulation of cell shape, and regulation of cell signaling were also differentially regulated in type 1 VWD ECFCs during stimulated release. To our knowledge, we have shown for the first time that transcriptome-wide differences exist between type 1 VWD and control ECFCs. These differences may contribute to bleeding in type 1 VWD, and further investigation may reveal novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
1 型血管性血友病(VWD)与定性正常的血管性血友病因子(VWF)减少有关。目前的诊断指南仅考虑基础 VWF 水平的贡献,尽管与出血严重程度缺乏相关性。刺激的 VWF 释放缺陷,即在止血挑战后发生,可能导致 1 型 VWD 出血,但发病机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,使用包括信使 RNA(mRNA)和 microRNA(miRNA)测序的分层多组学方法,评估了基础和刺激 VWF 释放期间 1 型 VWD 和对照衍生的内皮集落形成细胞(ECFC)之间的转录组全谱差异。本研究纳入了 8 例 1 型 VWD 患者和 4 例其他患者的 ECFC。VWF 蛋白分析显示 1 型 VWD 和对照 ECFC 对刺激的反应存在异质性。在基础 VWF 释放期间,1 型 VWD 和对照 ECFC 之间有 64 个 mRNA 和 7 个 miRNA 差异调节,鉴定了 65 个潜在致病性 miRNA-mRNA 相互作用。在刺激的 VWF 释放期间,1 型 VWD 和对照 ECFC 之间有 190 个 mRNA 和 5 个 mRNA 差异调节,鉴定了 110 个潜在致病性 miRNA-mRNA 相互作用。在刺激释放期间,1 型 VWD ECFC 中还有 5 个基因本体术语,包括凝血、细胞形状调节和细胞信号转导调节,也存在差异调节。据我们所知,我们首次显示 1 型 VWD 和对照 ECFC 之间存在转录组全谱差异。这些差异可能导致 1 型 VWD 出血,进一步的研究可能揭示新的生物标志物和治疗靶点。