Suppr超能文献

[钩骨钩骨折的当前治疗方法]

[Current treatment of hamate hook fractures].

作者信息

Scheufler O, Radmer S, Erdmann D, Exner K, Germann G, Andresen R

机构信息

Abteilung für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Asthetische Chirurgie, Universitätsspital Basel.

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006 Oct;38(5):273-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924318.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Hamate hook fractures can be treated conservatively or surgically, whereby fragment and fracture position, age of the fracture, associated injuries, and individual needs of the patient all influence the choice of the therapeutic procedure. Acute non-displaced fractures are frequently treated conservatively, while displaced fractures and nonunions undergo surgical treatment. We report our experience in diagnostic and therapeutic management of 14 hamate hook fractures. CLINICAL MATERIAL AND METHOD: During a three-year period, 14 patients (eleven men and three women) 21 to 73 years old (42.0 +/- 17.9 years) with fractures at the base of the hamate hook were treated at three hand surgery units. The retrospective study of all patients included a chart review, postoperative radiological imaging after one year, and clinical examinations with grip strength measurements after 18 to 34 months (27.8 +/- 4.9 months). In six patients (43 %), the acute fracture was immobilized in a lower arm cast for six weeks, while eight patients (57 %) were operated primarily. In five cases (36 %) excision of the fragment and in three cases (21 %) open reduction and internal fixation using a screw were performed. Of six patients treated conservatively, five developed nonunion after two to five months (3.0 +/- 1.2 months) with persistent pain and underwent secondary surgery. One patient was asymptomatic despite a nonunion and declined surgical treatment. In three cases the fragment was excised, while two patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a screw.

RESULTS

All patients operated primarily were free of complaints three months after surgery. The success rate of surgical treatment (8/8) was therefore significantly higher than that after conservative treatment (1/6).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conservative treatment of acute non-displaced hamate hook fractures, which is associated with a high risk of developing symptomatic nonunion, primary surgical treatment reliably yields a good clinical outcome. Here, results after fragment excision and open reduction and internal fixation are comparable.

摘要

目的

钩骨钩骨折可采用保守治疗或手术治疗,其中骨折块及骨折位置、骨折时间、合并损伤以及患者的个体需求均会影响治疗方法的选择。急性无移位骨折通常采用保守治疗,而移位骨折和骨不连则需手术治疗。我们报告了14例钩骨钩骨折的诊断及治疗经验。

临床资料与方法

在三年期间,三个手部外科单位共治疗了14例年龄在21至73岁(平均42.0±17.9岁)的钩骨钩基部骨折患者(11例男性,3例女性)。对所有患者进行回顾性研究,包括病历审查、术后一年的影像学检查以及18至34个月(平均27.8±4.9个月)后的握力测量临床检查。6例患者(43%)的急性骨折采用下臂石膏固定六周,而8例患者(57%)则首先接受手术治疗。5例(36%)进行了骨折块切除,3例(21%)采用螺钉进行切开复位内固定。在6例保守治疗的患者中,5例在2至5个月(平均3.0±1.2个月)后出现骨不连且持续疼痛,随后接受了二次手术。1例患者虽有骨不连但无症状,拒绝手术治疗。3例进行了骨折块切除,2例患者采用螺钉进行切开复位内固定。

结果

所有首次接受手术治疗的患者术后三个月均无不适主诉。因此,手术治疗的成功率(8/8)显著高于保守治疗(1/6)。

结论

与急性无移位钩骨钩骨折的保守治疗相比,保守治疗发生有症状骨不连的风险较高,而一期手术治疗能可靠地产生良好的临床效果。在此,骨折块切除及切开复位内固定后的结果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验