Suppr超能文献

21世纪的子宫切除术:不同的手术方式,不同的挑战。

Hysterectomy in the 21st century: different approaches, different challenges.

作者信息

Brill Andrew I

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Gynecology and Reparative Pelvic Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.

出版信息

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;49(4):722-35. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000211946.51712.42.

Abstract

The final decision to perform a certain method of hysterectomy customarily mirrors experience and level of comfort with a particular surgical approach in the context of the patient's condition and indication for surgery. Given the morbidity and recovery associated with a laparotomic incision, every effort should be made to avoid abdominal hysterectomy. The best available evidence points to the advantage of the vaginal approach over other methods of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Regrettably, the state of education in residency programs is not providing a level of surgical competency to meet this charge. Whenever vaginal surgery is not an option, laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy offers the best alternative. Although the promises of supracervical hysterectomy have yet to be demonstrated, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy may offer the least morbid alternative to vaginal hysterectomy.

摘要

决定采用某种子宫切除术的最终决策通常反映了在患者病情和手术指征背景下,对特定手术方式的经验和熟悉程度。鉴于剖腹手术切口相关的发病率和恢复情况,应尽一切努力避免腹式子宫切除术。现有最佳证据表明,对于良性疾病,经阴道手术方式优于其他子宫切除方法。遗憾的是,住院医师培训项目的教育水平未能提供达到这一要求的手术能力。只要经阴道手术不可行,腹腔镜辅助子宫切除术就是最佳选择。尽管次全子宫切除术的优势尚未得到证实,但腹腔镜次全子宫切除术可能是经阴道子宫切除术之外创伤最小的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验