• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫切除术——手术方式的比较

Hysterectomy-a comparison of approaches.

作者信息

Müller Andreas, Thiel Falk C, Renner Stefan P, Winkler Mathias, Häberle Lothar, Beckmann Matthias W

机构信息

Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 May;107(20):353-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0353. Epub 2010 May 21.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0353
PMID:20539807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2883234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advantages and disadvantages of the various surgical techniques for hysterectomy are currently a topic of debate, with particular controversy over leaving the cervix in situ in the laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) procedure.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, medical history and clinical characteristics were compared in patients who had undergone hysterectomy for benign disease in the period 2002-2008 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital. Postoperative satisfaction and the frequency of secondary operations for prolapse or incontinence in women with surgery between 2002 and 2007 were surveyed by means of a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The longest hospital stay was observed after abdominal hysterectomy (AH; 10 days), followed by vaginal hysterectomy (VH; 7.8 days) and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH; 7.2 days). The shortest stays in hospital were seen after LASH (5.9 days) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH; 5.7 days). The shortest operating time was noted with VH (87 min) and the longest with LAVH (122 min). The lowest rates of blood loss were with LASH (1.38 g/dL) and TLH (1.51 g/dL). The highest rate of postoperative complications occurred after AH (8.9%). No differences were found in relation to postoperative satisfaction or surgery for prolapse or incontinence.

CONCLUSION

No postoperative benefits were found for leaving the cervix in situ when performing LASH. However, this was not a controlled randomized study.

摘要

背景

目前,各种子宫切除术手术技术的优缺点是一个争论的话题,尤其是在腹腔镜次全子宫切除术(LASH)中保留宫颈原位的问题上存在特别的争议。

方法

在一项回顾性单中心研究中,对2002年至2008年期间在埃尔朗根大学医院妇产科因良性疾病接受子宫切除术的患者的病史和临床特征进行了比较。通过问卷调查了2002年至2007年期间接受手术的女性的术后满意度以及因脱垂或尿失禁进行二次手术的频率。

结果

腹式子宫切除术(AH)后观察到最长住院时间(10天),其次是阴式子宫切除术(VH;7.8天)和腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH;7.2天)。LASH(5.9天)和全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH;5.7天)后的住院时间最短。VH的手术时间最短(87分钟),LAVH的手术时间最长(122分钟)。LASH(1.38 g/dL)和TLH(1.51 g/dL)的失血量最低。AH后的术后并发症发生率最高(8.9%)。在术后满意度或脱垂或尿失禁手术方面未发现差异。

结论

进行LASH时保留宫颈原位未发现术后益处。然而,这不是一项对照随机研究。

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy-a comparison of approaches.子宫切除术——手术方式的比较
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 May;107(20):353-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0353. Epub 2010 May 21.
2
Comparison of prevalence of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women after five different hysterectomy procedures.比较五种不同子宫切除术式后女性低性欲障碍(HSDD)的患病率。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
3
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术及经腹子宫切除术的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0481-7. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
5
Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.经典筋膜内子宫次全切除术与全腹腔镜及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的比较。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80028-5.
6
[COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗女性生殖系统良性疾病及病变的比较
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2016;55 Suppl 1 Pt 1:4-10.
7
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.使用电外科双极血管封闭技术的全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术和经腹全子宫切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3571-3. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) in women with uterine leiomyoma.子宫平滑肌瘤女性行全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)与腹腔镜辅助子宫次全切除术(LASH)的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144(1):76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
9
A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.前瞻性随机比较经阴道子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的女性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Feb;148(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.019. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
10
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy at the University Hospital of the West Indies: a 5-year retrospective study.西印度群岛大学医院全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项5年回顾性研究。
West Indian Med J. 2012 Dec;61(9):865-9. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2012.275.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the effect of the type of hysterectomy on the incidence of stress urinary incontinence.评估子宫切除术类型对压力性尿失禁发生率的影响。
Prz Menopauzalny. 2025 Mar;24(1):45-52. doi: 10.5114/pm.2025.150036. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Impact of Prior Abdominal Surgery on Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.既往腹部手术对全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 Feb 17;17(2):e79151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79151. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Four-handed Technique for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: An Italian Experience.全腹腔镜子宫切除术的四手操作技术:一项意大利的经验
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):161-167. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_50_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Surgical Treatment of Patients with Endometriosis in the Certified Endometriosis Centers of the DACH Region - A Subanalysis of the Quality Assurance Study QS ENDO pilot.DACH地区认证子宫内膜异位症中心子宫内膜异位症患者的外科治疗——质量保证研究QS ENDO试点的子分析
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Jul 9;84(7):646-655. doi: 10.1055/a-2324-3778. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Uterine allograft removal by total laparoscopic hysterectomy after successful cesarean delivery in a living-donor uterus recipient with uterovaginal agenesis (MRKHS).在一名接受活体供体子宫的、存在阴道子宫发育不全(MRKHS)的患者成功剖宫产分娩后,通过全腹腔镜子宫切除术切除子宫移植物。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):827-840. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06796-7. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
The hysterectomy: influence of the surgical method in benign disease on convalescence and quality of life.子宫切除术:良性疾病手术方法对恢复和生活质量的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06778-9. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.评价腹腔镜辅助经宫颈子宫切除术(LASH)治疗 1274 例大子宫的并发症、中转率、恶性肿瘤发生率及术者经验:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Dec;101(12):1450-1457. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14468. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
Detection rate with routine postoperative renal ultrasound to identify urinary tract injury after gynecological surgery.妇科手术后通过常规术后肾脏超声检查识别尿路损伤的检出率。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1617-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06714-x. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
9
Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.腹腔镜子宫切除术与阴道子宫切除术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:POP-UP 研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):841-850. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04591-z. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征子宫切除术的费用预测因素。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101936. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the Hohl instrument in nonobese and obese women.在非肥胖和肥胖女性中使用Hohl器械进行全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的可行性和安全性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Feb;36(1):159-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01112.x.
2
Risk factors for pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy.子宫切除术后盆底修复的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):601-608. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181998998.
3
Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) in women with uterine leiomyoma.子宫平滑肌瘤女性行全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)与腹腔镜辅助子宫次全切除术(LASH)的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144(1):76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
4
Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic total or supracervical hysterectomy.腹腔镜全子宫切除术或次全子宫切除术术后的患者满意度
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67(3):169-72. doi: 10.1159/000184679. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
5
A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.1990年至2006年期间针对良性疾病进行的3190例腹腔镜子宫切除术:与经阴道和开腹手术相比的并发症评估
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):492-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01966.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
6
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications.良性指征子宫切除术后盆腔器官脱垂手术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):572.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
7
Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study.子宫切除术与压力性尿失禁手术风险:全国性队列研究
Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1494-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61635-3.
8
Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术及经腹子宫切除术的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0481-7. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
9
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy.子宫切除术后盆底器官脱垂修复的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):625-32. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278567.37925.4e.
10
Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.不同子宫切除方式后阴道残端裂开的发生率及患者特征
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.005.