• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作时间限制对住院医师而言作为一种伦理困境:对违规类型和频率的描述性调查

Work hours restrictions as an ethical dilemma for residents: a descriptive survey of violation types and frequency.

作者信息

Carpenter Robert O, Spooner John, Arbogast Patrick G, Tarpley John L, Griffin Marie R, Lomis Kimberly D

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2730, USA.

出版信息

Curr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;63(6):448-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.003
PMID:17084777
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented requirements regarding allowable duty hours for resident training in the United States in July 2003. In a previous pilot study at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a significant number of residents reported violation of requirements. In addition, almost half of those individuals admitted under-reporting their hours worked. The authors' goal was to further delineate the type and frequency of violations and under-reporting.

METHODS

A survey tool was designed to assess specific types of violations as well as factors that influence the number of hours residents worked and reported. Approval was obtained from the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board and Office of Graduate Medical Education before enrollment of subjects. The program directors of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Medicine-Pediatrics, and General Surgery supported the participation of their residents. A voluntary anonymous survey of these residents was conducted 1 year after the pilot study.

RESULTS

Of 263 eligible residents, 175 were surveyed. Of 175 residents, 125 (71%) residents responded. Eighty-five percent of residents reported violation of duty-hour requirements within the preceding 3 months. Residents reported violation of specific requirements as follows: 1 day off in 7, 28%; 80-hour weekly average, 65%; and "24+6" consecutive hours, 85%. Residents were asked to estimate the number of hours by which they exceeded requirements. Hours over the 80-hour weekly requirement were reported as follows: 1 hour, 12%; 2 hours, 15%; 3 hours, 21%; 4 hours, 5%; 5 hours, 14%; and 6 or more hours, 33%. Hours over the "24+6" requirement were reported as follows: 1 hour, 30%; 2 hours, 42%; 3 hours, 18%; 4 hours, 7%; 5 hours, 1%; and 6 or more hours, 2%. Forty-eight percent of respondents admitted under-reporting violations to their program director.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighty-five percent of residents reported at least 1 violation, and 48% admitted under-reporting violations. These results support the previous findings of 80% and 49%, respectively. Of the various requirements, the "24+6" rule was most frequently violated. Of those in violation of the "24+6" requirement, the majority (90%) exceeded limits by no more than 3 hours. Of those in violation of the 80-hour weekly average requirement, the majority (57%) exceeded limits by no more than 5 hours. Per the ACGME website, "an RRC may grant exceptions for up to 10% of the 80-hour limit, to individual programs based on a sound educational rationale." Although the overall percent of residents reporting violation remains high, the number of excess hours worked is small relative to established standards (within 10%). The authors propose that systems adaptations could be developed to improve compliance. Special attention is warranted to investigate the activities of residents in the post-call period.

摘要

背景

毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)于2003年7月在美国实施了住院医师培训允许工作时长的相关要求。在范德堡大学医学中心此前的一项试点研究中,大量住院医师报告称存在违反要求的情况。此外,几乎一半的受访者承认少报了工作时长。作者的目标是进一步明确违规及少报情况的类型和频率。

方法

设计了一种调查工具,用于评估特定类型的违规行为以及影响住院医师工作和上报时长的因素。在招募受试者之前,已获得范德堡大学机构审查委员会和毕业后医学教育办公室的批准。儿科学、内科学、医学 - 儿科学和普通外科的项目主任支持其住院医师参与调查。在试点研究1年后,对这些住院医师进行了一次自愿匿名调查。

结果

在263名符合条件的住院医师中,175人接受了调查。在175名住院医师中,125人(71%)进行了回复。85%的住院医师报告在过去3个月内违反了工作时长要求。住院医师报告的具体违规情况如下:连续7天休息1天,占28%;每周平均80小时,占65%;“24 + 6”连续小时数,占85%。要求住院医师估计超出要求的时长。超出每周80小时要求的时长报告如下:1小时,占12%;2小时,占15%;3小时,占21%;4小时,占5%;5小时,占14%;6小时及以上,占33%。超出“24 + 6”要求的时长报告如下:1小时,占30%;2小时,占42%;3小时,占18%;4小时,占7%;5小时,占1%;6小时及以上,占2%。48%的受访者承认向项目主任少报了违规情况。

结论

85%的住院医师报告至少有1次违规,48%的人承认少报了违规情况。这些结果分别支持了之前80%和49%的研究结果。在各项要求中,“24 + 6”规则被违反的频率最高。在违反“24 + 6”要求的人中,大多数(90%)超出限制不超过3小时。在违反每周平均80小时要求的人中,大多数(57%)超出限制不超过5小时。根据ACGME网站的规定,“基于合理的教育理由,地区评审委员会(RRC)可为个别项目批准最多不超过80小时限制的10%的例外情况。”尽管报告违规的住院医师总体比例仍然很高,但相对于既定标准(在10%以内),超出的工作时长数量较少。作者建议可以开发系统适应性措施以提高合规性。特别需要关注调查住院医师下班后的活动。

相似文献

1
Work hours restrictions as an ethical dilemma for residents: a descriptive survey of violation types and frequency.工作时间限制对住院医师而言作为一种伦理困境:对违规类型和频率的描述性调查
Curr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;63(6):448-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.003.
2
Work-hour restrictions as an ethical dilemma for residents.
Am J Surg. 2006 Apr;191(4):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.002.
3
Understanding accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) guidelines: resident and program director interpretation of work-hour restrictions.理解研究生医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 指南:住院医师和项目主任对工作时间限制的解释。
J Surg Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;66(6):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.05.002.
4
Is the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Resident/Fellow survey, a valid tool to assess general surgery residency programs compliance with work hours regulations?《住院医师规范化培训评估》(ACGME)调查,是否是评估普通外科住院医师培训计划遵守工作时间规定的有效工具?
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 7.
5
A survey of residents and faculty regarding work hour limitations in surgical training programs.一项针对住院医师和教员关于外科培训项目工作时间限制的调查。
Arch Surg. 2003 Jun;138(6):663-9; discussion 669-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.6.663.
6
Brief communication of the Residency Review Committee-Surgery (RRC-S) on residents' surgical volume in general surgery.住院医师评审委员会-外科(RRC-S)关于普通外科住院医师手术量的简短通讯。
Am J Surg. 2005 Sep;190(3):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.036.
7
2011 ACGME duty hour week proposal--a national survey of family medicine residents.2011年美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会工作时长周提案——一项针对家庭医学住院医师的全国性调查
Fam Med. 2011 May;43(5):318-24.
8
Residents' working hours in a consortium-wide surgical education program.全联盟外科教育项目中住院医师的工作时长
Am Surg. 2004 Feb;70(2):127-31; discussion 131.
9
Impact of duty hour restrictions on otolaryngology training: divergent resident and faculty perspectives.工作时间限制对耳鼻喉科培训的影响:住院医师与教员的不同观点
Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1127-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224348.44616.fb.
10
Work Hours Assessment and Monitoring Initiative (WHAMI) under resident direction: a strategy for working within limitations.在住院医师指导下的工作时间评估与监测计划(WHAMI):一种在限制范围内工作的策略。
Curr Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;62(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.10.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Enforcement of the Act to Improve Training Conditions and the Status of Medical Residents in Emergency Abdominal Surgery.《提升急诊腹部外科住院医师培训条件与地位法案实施效果的影响》。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Aug;63(8):751-758. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.8.751.
2
Competence vs. Identity, Trainees vs. Physicians: How COVID-19 Has Highlighted Role Confusion in Residency Training.能力与身份、实习生与医生:新冠疫情如何凸显住院医师培训中的角色困惑
Acad Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;45(5):545-548. doi: 10.1007/s40596-020-01346-2. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
Pediatric trainees systematically under-report duty hour violations compared to electronic health record defined shifts.
儿科受训者系统地比电子健康记录定义的轮班少报告工时违规行为。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226493. eCollection 2019.
4
Automatic Detection of Front-Line Clinician Hospital Shifts: A Novel Use of Electronic Health Record Timestamp Data.基于电子病历时间戳数据的一线临床医师班次自动检测:一种新的应用
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):28-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676819. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Resident perceptions of the impact of duty hour restrictions on resident-attending interactions: an exploratory study.住院医师对工作时间限制对住院医师-主治医生互动影响的看法:一项探索性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0963-7.
6
Principles of fatigue in residency education: a qualitative study.住院医师培训中的疲劳原则:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2016 Apr 28;4(2):E200-4. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150086. eCollection 2016 Apr-Jun.
7
Residents as Educators: A Modern Model.住院医师作为教育者:一种现代模式。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):949-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Organizational interventions in response to duty hour reforms.针对值班时间改革的组织干预措施。
BMC Med Educ. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S4. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
Are duty hour regulations promoting a culture of dishonesty among resident physicians?值班时间规定是否在住院医师中助长了不诚实的风气?
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):553-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00220.1.
10
Compliance and falsification of duty hours: reports from residents and program directors.工作时长的合规性与弄虚作假:住院医师和项目主任的报告
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):368-73. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00375.1.