Department of Surgery, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58203, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 7.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) uses the resident/fellow survey to assess residency programs compliance with ACGME work hours regulations. Survey results can have significant consequences for residency programs including ACGME letters of warning, shortened program accreditation cycle, immediate full program and institutional site visits, or administrative withdrawal of a program's accreditation. Survey validity was assessed by direct query of general surgery residents who answer the survey each year. A multiple-choice survey was created to assess all US general surgery residents' interpretation and understanding of the ACGME survey. The survey was distributed to all surgery residency program directors in the US in 2009. Responses were compiled via an online survey program. Statistical analysis was performed in aggregate and between junior and senior residents. Nine hundred sixty-five (13.2%) general surgical residents responded with 961 (99.6%) completing all questions. All responding residents had taken the ACGME survey at least once with 634 (66%) having taken it more than once. Nineteen percent of residents had difficulty understanding the questions with senior residents (23%) reporting difficulty more than junior residents (14%), p < 0.001. Thirty-five percent of residents had discussed the survey with their faculty or program director prior to taking it, while 17% were instructed on how to answer the survey. One hundred thirty-three residents (14%) admitted to not answering the questions truthfully while 352 (37%) of residents felt that the survey did not provide an accurate evaluation of their work hours in residency training. An evaluation tool in which 1 in 7 residents admit to answering the questions falsely and 1 in 5 residents had difficulty interpreting the questions may not be a valid method to evaluate compliance with work hours regulations. Evaluation of work hours regulations compliance should be based on actual work hours data rather than an anonymous survey.
美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)使用住院医师/研究员调查来评估住院医师培训计划是否符合 ACGME 工时法规。调查结果可能对住院医师培训计划产生重大影响,包括 ACGME 警告信、缩短项目认证周期、立即对整个项目和机构现场进行访问,或行政撤销项目认证。通过每年回答调查的普通外科住院医师的直接查询来评估调查的有效性。创建了一个多项选择调查来评估所有美国普通外科住院医师对 ACGME 调查的解释和理解。该调查于 2009 年分发给美国所有外科住院医师培训项目主任。通过在线调查程序汇总和比较初级和高级住院医师的回复。965 名(13.2%)普通外科住院医师做出了回应,其中 961 名(99.6%)完成了所有问题。所有做出回应的住院医师至少参加过一次 ACGME 调查,其中 634 名(66%)参加过不止一次。19%的住院医师对问题理解有困难,其中高年级住院医师(23%)报告的困难多于低年级住院医师(14%),p<0.001。35%的住院医师在参加调查之前与他们的教员或项目主任讨论过调查,而 17%的住院医师被指导如何回答调查。有 133 名住院医师(14%)承认没有如实回答问题,而 352 名住院医师(37%)认为调查没有准确评估他们在住院医师培训中的工作时间。如果有 1/7 的住院医师承认回答问题不真实,而有 1/5 的住院医师对解释问题有困难,那么这种评估工具可能不是评估工时法规合规性的有效方法。工时法规合规性的评估应该基于实际的工时数据,而不是匿名调查。