Suppr超能文献

转移性乳腺癌:当前治疗方法能否改善生活质量?一项前瞻性研究。

Metastatic breast cancer: do current treatments improve quality of life? A prospective study.

作者信息

Amado Fernanda, Lourenço Maria Teresa Cruz, Deheinzelin Daniel

机构信息

Fundação Antonio Prudente, Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa, Hospital do Câncer, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2006 Jul 6;124(4):203-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802006000400006.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

In metastatic breast cancer cases, the currently available therapeutic approaches provide minimal improvement in survival. As such, quality of life (QOL) becomes one of the main objectives of treatment. It is not known whether current treatments derived from trials improve QOL. The aim was to evaluate changes in QOL among metastatic breast cancer patients receiving treatment derived from trials.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective observational QOL survey in a tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

To evaluate the influence of current treatments on patients' QOL, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were applied on three occasions: before starting treatment and at the 6th and 12th weeks, to consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients over a one-year period.

RESULTS

We found an improvement in QOL in the sample evaluated (n = 40), expressed by changes in the overall SF-36 score (p = 0.002) and the BDI (p = 0.004). Taken individually, the SF-36 components Pain, Social Functioning and Mental Health also improved significantly. Patients with worse initial performance status and secondary symptoms displayed greater improvement than those with better initial performance status and asymptomatic disease (p < 0.001). Patients who received more than one type of therapy showed larger gains than those given only one type (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

In our environment, current metastatic breast cancer treatments can improve QOL, especially among symptomatic patients and those with low performance status.

摘要

背景与目的

在转移性乳腺癌病例中,目前可用的治疗方法对生存率的改善甚微。因此,生活质量(QOL)成为治疗的主要目标之一。目前尚不清楚源自试验的现有治疗方法是否能改善生活质量。本研究旨在评估接受源自试验的治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的生活质量变化。

设计与环境

在一家三级癌症中心进行的前瞻性观察性生活质量调查。

方法

为评估当前治疗对患者生活质量的影响,在三个时间点对连续的转移性乳腺癌患者应用医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷(SF - 36)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI):治疗开始前、第6周和第12周,为期一年。

结果

我们发现所评估样本(n = 40)的生活质量有所改善,表现为SF - 36总分变化(p = 0.002)和BDI变化(p = 0.004)。单独来看,SF - 36的疼痛、社会功能和心理健康分量表也有显著改善。初始表现状态较差和有继发症状的患者比初始表现状态较好且无症状疾病的患者改善更大(p < 0.001)。接受一种以上治疗类型的患者比仅接受一种治疗类型的患者改善更大(p = 0.038)。

结论

在我们的研究环境中,目前的转移性乳腺癌治疗可以改善生活质量,尤其是在有症状的患者和表现状态较差的患者中。

相似文献

1
Metastatic breast cancer: do current treatments improve quality of life? A prospective study.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2006 Jul 6;124(4):203-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802006000400006.
6
Sexual activity and quality of life in patients after treatment for breast and ovarian cancer.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4922-2. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
[Health-related quality of life assessment in depression after low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation].
Encephale. 2014 Feb;40(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing SF-36 scores across three groups of women with different health profiles.
Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1251-61. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-6673-8.
2
Comparison of health-related quality of life questionnaires in ambulatory oncology.
Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1239-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-5534-9.
3
Taxane containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003366.pub2.
5
An inventory for measuring depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.
7
Quality of life: a new perspective for cancer patients.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Nov;2(11):873-9. doi: 10.1038/nrc930.
10
Prospective assessment of quality of life of female cancer patients.
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Apr;85(1):140-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6586.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验