Suppr超能文献

外周抽取的血清与中心静脉导管抽取的血清中庆大霉素浓度的一致程度。

Extent of agreement in gentamicin concentration between serum that is drawn peripherally and from central venous catheters.

作者信息

Boodhan Sabrina, Maloney Anne Marie, Dupuis L Lee

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1650-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0023. Epub 2006 Nov 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

At our institution, patients who receive once-daily dosing of gentamicin have serum concentrations determined 3 and 6 hours after dose administration. Patients with single-lumen central venous catheters have the 3-hour samples drawn peripherally. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent of agreement between peripheral and central venous catheter serum gentamicin concentrations drawn 3 hours after dose administration.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, patients provided both a peripheral and a central blood sample for determination of serum gentamicin concentration. The order of sampling (central venous catheter versus peripheral first) was randomized. Agreement was assessed by determination of the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The clinically acceptable targets for the lower limit of the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were defined a priori as >0.80 and +/-6%, respectively. Differences between the theoretical dose adjustments using the central venous catheter versus the peripheral sample result were described.

RESULTS

Forty-five pairs of samples were collected: 42 from single-lumen implantable central venous catheters (ports) and 3 from peripherally inserted central venous catheters. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91. However, the Bland-Altman analysis resulted in a mean percentage difference (central venous catheter versus peripheral) of -0.92% and limits of agreement of -27.9% to 26.0%. The gentamicin dose adjustment based on the central venous catheter sample result would have led to clinically significant dose adjustments in 19 (42%) cases, when compared with the peripheral sample result.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a lack of agreement between peripheral and single-lumen central venous catheter samples. In particular, ports are not appropriate sites for monitoring serum gentamicin concentrations.

摘要

目的

在我们机构,接受庆大霉素每日一次给药的患者在给药后3小时和6小时测定血清浓度。使用单腔中心静脉导管的患者在给药3小时后的样本从外周采集。本研究的目的是评估给药3小时后外周血和中心静脉导管血清庆大霉素浓度之间的一致程度。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察研究中,患者同时提供外周血和中心血样本以测定血清庆大霉素浓度。采样顺序(中心静脉导管样本与外周样本哪个先采集)是随机的。通过测定组内相关系数和Bland-Altman分析来评估一致性。组内相关系数下限和Bland-Altman一致性界限的临床可接受目标分别预先定义为>0.80和±6%。描述了使用中心静脉导管样本与外周样本结果进行理论剂量调整之间的差异。

结果

共采集了45对样本:42对来自单腔植入式中心静脉导管(端口),3对来自外周插入中心静脉导管。组内相关系数为0.91。然而,Bland-Altman分析得出平均百分比差异(中心静脉导管样本与外周样本)为-0.92%,一致性界限为-27.9%至26.0%。与外周样本结果相比,基于中心静脉导管样本结果进行庆大霉素剂量调整在19例(42%)病例中会导致具有临床意义的剂量调整。

结论

这些结果表明外周血样本与单腔中心静脉导管样本之间缺乏一致性。特别是,端口不是监测血清庆大霉素浓度的合适部位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验