• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparing two methods to obtain blood specimens from pediatric central venous catheters.

作者信息

Barton Sharon Jackson, Chase Teresa, Latham Barbara, Rayens Mary Kay

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Kentucky and University of Kentucky Children's Hospital, Lexington 40536-0232, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;21(6):320-6. doi: 10.1177/1043454204269604.

DOI:10.1177/1043454204269604
PMID:15475468
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test agreement in blood values obtained from a discard method and a push-pull method in samples from central venous catheters in pediatric patients. The discard method causes blood loss beyond what is necessary for blood testing and increases potential for infection each time the central venous catheter is entered. Twenty-eight children ranging in age from 6 months to 12 years were enrolled in the study. A research protocol was developed to pair the 2 methods of blood collection for each sample. The Bland-Altman method was used to test agreement on each blood value for each paired sample. Of the 438 pairs of measured blood values, 420 (95.9%) fell within the limits of agreement. Nurses reported no difficulty in using the push-pull technique to obtain any samples. The push-pull method of obtaining blood specimens from pediatric central venous catheters should be considered. It can eliminate blood loss through discard and can reduce infection because it reduces the number of times a catheter is entered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparing two methods to obtain blood specimens from pediatric central venous catheters.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;21(6):320-6. doi: 10.1177/1043454204269604.
2
Comparison of push-pull versus discard method from central venous catheters for blood testing.中心静脉导管采血用于血液检测时推注-回抽法与弃血法的比较。
J Intraven Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;21(5):282-5.
3
Examining the push-pull method of blood sampling from central venous access devices.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;25(4):200-7. doi: 10.1177/1043454208320975. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Methods of drawing blood samples through central venous catheters in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplant: results of a national survey.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Jun;21(5):879-84.
5
Discard volumes necessary for clinically useful coagulation studies from heparinized Hickman catheters.从肝素化的希克曼导管中丢弃临床有用的凝血研究所需的血量。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 May;23(4):671-5.
6
A reliable and safe method of collecting blood samples from implantable central venous catheters for determination of plasma gentamicin concentrations.一种从植入式中心静脉导管采集血样以测定血浆庆大霉素浓度的可靠且安全的方法。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Aug;31(8):776-84. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.8.776.
7
Comparison of the Single-Syringe Push-Pull Technique With the Discard Technique for Obtaining Blood Samples From Pediatric Central Venous Access Devices.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;34(6):381-386. doi: 10.1177/1043454217713453. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
A study to determine the minimum volume of blood necessary to be discarded from a central venous catheter before a valid sample is obtained in children with cancer.一项确定癌症患儿在获取有效样本前需从中心静脉导管丢弃的最低血量的研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;48(7):687-95. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20873.
9
Extent of agreement in gentamicin concentration between serum that is drawn peripherally and from central venous catheters.外周抽取的血清与中心静脉导管抽取的血清中庆大霉素浓度的一致程度。
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1650-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0023. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
10
[Permanent central venous catheter in pediatric oncology].[儿科肿瘤学中的永久性中心静脉导管]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Jun 5;151(23):1470-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of 3 mL versus 5 mL Discarded Volume for Blood Sampling from Central Venous Access Device.从中心静脉通路装置采血时3毫升与5毫升弃血体积的效果比较
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jun;13(2):112-117. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726669. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
A Standard Push-Pull Protocol for Waste-Free Sampling in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.儿科重症监护病房无废物采样的标准推挽协议。
J Infus Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;41(3):189-197. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000279.
3
Clinical trial designs and models for analgesic medications for acute pain in neonates, infants, toddlers, children, and adolescents: ACTTION recommendations.
用于新生儿、婴儿、学步儿童、儿童和青少年急性疼痛的镇痛药的临床试验设计和模型:ACHTION 建议。
Pain. 2018 Feb;159(2):193-205. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001104.
4
Multidisciplinary care in pediatric oncology.儿科肿瘤的多学科护理。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:171-81. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S7108. Epub 2011 May 30.
5
Discarding the initial aliquot of blood does not reduce contamination rates in intravenous-catheter-drawn blood cultures.丢弃初始血样并不能降低经静脉导管采集的血培养污染率。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2950-1. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00292-09. Epub 2009 Jul 29.